Recent content by MBdS

After rereading the example (I dont know why I stopped at Bruka), there's the example regarding Prints at the end of the page. While, after thinking a bit, we could even say that Bruka's example makes implicit that Bruka parry effortlessly with 2xPA the trollkin attack and then reacts (even if...

I guess that's a typo... or a previous ruling not corrected (maybe originally the rule for STR/DEX minimums was designed to lower damage, not attack %).

http://www.twokingdoms.com/worldmap.htm weird... do Mongoose or Joe Dever know about this?

Yeah, I think so, but I'd like an official answer. We should drop price and armour point like you say hmm... looking at the table I think the Helmet should have 4 AP, else it would be identical to the chainmail coif and cost less... but... an Helmet shouldn't be better than a chainmail coif...

Hmm... one question come to my mind. Looking at table on page 51 or (50, but 51 make it clearer what I wanna express)... Attack vs. Parry. For simplicity sake we ignore criticals hits. Okay I hit and my opponent chooses to parry: he fails the roll, the table say hit him, he succeeds, can use...

the example says the trollking attack fails... and you cant obtain that result with a success on the attack and a critical success on the defender. The troll attack would have succeeded, but Bruka's weapons would have get 2xAP and riposte. The example says the troll fails the attack and Bruka...

Well the book states "Fego, on the other hand, decides to use a Charge Combat Action to attack Bruka. While he succeeds in his 1H Hammer test to hit the human, Bruka is not surprised and can therefore use Reactions normally. Bruka decides to parry the club with his military flail. The two...

ok, armour give armour points (nowhere it says how much damage can be lowered down to 0, or even lower... hmm, ok, im not stupid but, an official ruling? I guess as rules given in the core rules, damage can go down to 0). but... hmm... there are a some things that are not clear. First: Why...

Do they really can be set against a charge, or more probably were meant to have the "2" apex near them, so they can impale (see table on page 33)?

So the combat example on page 61 is wrong (it clearly states that the trollkin roll twice the attack roll against Bruka, the first suceed and the second fail opening itself for Bruka riposte). Also, is it possible that weapon damage after armour points could be reduced to 0 or even lower (I...