M MBdS Mongoose Aug 9, 2006 #1 Do they really can be set against a charge, or more probably were meant to have the "2" apex near them, so they can impale (see table on page 33)?
Do they really can be set against a charge, or more probably were meant to have the "2" apex near them, so they can impale (see table on page 33)?
R Rurik Mongoose Aug 9, 2006 #2 Interesting. The preview has the shortsword right. It has a "1" for a footnote, which reads "This weapon will impale an opponent upon a critical hit."
Interesting. The preview has the shortsword right. It has a "1" for a footnote, which reads "This weapon will impale an opponent upon a critical hit."
A atgxtg Mongoose Aug 10, 2006 #3 Maybe it's been streamlined? It meets the critera: 1) It is causing confusion. 2) It doesn;t make sense 3) it is a change from previous edtions of RQ. :wink:
Maybe it's been streamlined? It meets the critera: 1) It is causing confusion. 2) It doesn;t make sense 3) it is a change from previous edtions of RQ. :wink:
H Halfbat Mongoose Aug 10, 2006 #4 MBdS said: Do they really can be set against a charge, or more probably were meant to have the "2" apex near them, so they can impale (see table on page 33)? Click to expand... Good spot! I just assumed it meant the impale footnote.
MBdS said: Do they really can be set against a charge, or more probably were meant to have the "2" apex near them, so they can impale (see table on page 33)? Click to expand... Good spot! I just assumed it meant the impale footnote.
