andakitty said:I agree. So abstain, like me. :?
andakitty said:Wow. Are many of these voting with no knowledge of what older versions are like, or am I just getting old and out of touch? Completely.
How very depressing.
atgxtg said:andakitty said:I agree. So abstain, like me. :?
But I like both of them better than MRQ. I can go from RQ2 to RQ3 and back fairly easily and painlessly.
andakitty said:OK, so I voted for RQ2. At least MRQ is better than 3.5 D20. At this point I am not sure just how much that is saying, though.
Rurik said:I agree, the choices seem to be chosen to split the pre-MRQ vote. Abstaining rather than choosing to vote between 2 or 3 is almost a vote for MRQ. The poll was MRQ vs RQ 2/3, and you would have voted for RQ 2/3, you should choose one of those and vote for it.
andakitty said:To which? Be careful how you answer. :evil:![]()
Lieutenant Rasczak said:andakitty said:Told you.
I wish you had made it to include Stormbringer, though. I'd be kind of interested to see how that impresses people compared with RQ in general. It being a sort of trimmed down version of the same rules.
But if we do that we have to include WOW, Call of C'Thulhu, Ring World, and all the others that RQ Inspired!
It would get too messy Lol!
Rurik said:andakitty said:OK, so I voted for RQ2. At least MRQ is better than 3.5 D20. At this point I am not sure just how much that is saying, though.
Have you read the Second Age Ralios PDF yet?
Enpeze said:The question is not about the source material. Its about systems.![]()
Enpeze said:Rurik said:andakitty said:OK, so I voted for RQ2. At least MRQ is better than 3.5 D20. At this point I am not sure just how much that is saying, though.
Have you read the Second Age Ralios PDF yet?
The question is not about the source material. Its about systems.![]()
Lieutenant Rasczak said:Enpeze said:Because many people play their own variation of RQ2 or RQ3 (maybe soon MRQ) I would include an option like "homebrewn version of RQx" or so.
But the Poll is for OFFICIAL versions of RQ, not Slayers or the net "RQ4".
atgxtg said:I believe he was reffering to the question of the thread-What version of RQ is your favorite.
atgxtg said:I was a lot more pro-MRQ too, a long time ago. It would be hard for kitty to post much about the source material considering that there isn't that much of it yet.
I for one, haven't seen one MRQ sourcebook that I have liked. I haven't seen one that I don't like either. In fact, I haven't seen a MRQ sourcebook. When I see one in the store, I'll flip through it and see if I want to pick it up. Until then, I have no idea what the sourecebooks are like.
Rurik said:atgxtg said:I believe he was reffering to the question of the thread-What version of RQ is your favorite.
Doh. My bad.
Can't a guy go off topic around here? It was not like a major threadjack attempt.
Rurik said:Well, the Ralios PDF is available, and I like it.