Twiddling my thumbs until August?
- Thread starter Guy_LeDouche
- Start date
Voracioustigger
Mongoose
Turtle said:
I would be shocked if the Forth weren't in the preview. There really would be no explanation for it.
However, I would NOT be shocked if one or two of the previews got tweaked before release (either because of our further testing or everyone else's comments).
Voracioustigger
Mongoose
Turtle said:
I didn't know when my OWN S&P articles were going to be published until I saw them in S&P, so I think you're asking the wrong people.
I think Matt has said before that they would be... he's pretty much the only person who posts here frequently and knows for sure.
Voracioustigger said:
If the preview is intended to let old players to get playing sooner with their old models there is...Nobody has forth models so technicly there's no need for those stats...
Though of course there's also reason to include them. To rise up interest in Forth. So we'll probably see them as there's no harm done to put them
Voracioustigger
Mongoose
Well, if you don't get excited about the Forth in Wave 1, you'll certainly be hard pressed not to want to try them out on Wave 2... because just... damn...
Proteus454
Mongoose
Voracioustigger said:
;___; It's not nice to tease. *sob*
Voracioustigger
Mongoose
Proteus454 said:
I'm not teasing... I'm just trying to keep people interested! Would you rather I have said, "I hope you like Wave 1 of the Forth because everything else they're getting sucks?"
If everything continues as planned, I think the Forth are going to be the highlight of the first couple waves and they're going to get a lot of players really fast (though I think a Forth army may end up costing almost as much as a bug army).
lastbesthope
Mongoose
Page 4 of S&P #42 Wargamer
LBH
LBH
