Well obviously we''ll have to wait until we can draw conclusions, but since we're having this discussion, I have a few queries as to how this might work in practice.
While it seems clear that the 'Foreven Clause' will allow us to produce subsectors and worlds and adventures that include things like conflicts between the 3I and Zhodani in Foreven, and the operations of the IISS there, what about references to more tangential aspects of the OTU?
For instance, let's say I produced a book about sensors, with more elaborate mechanical nitty-gritty and descriptions of all forms of sci-fi sensors, from tricorders to Culture type field technology. Let's say I also include some discussion about some OTU specific stuff, like densimeters and NAS, with reference to how the Imperial Navy or Zhodani commandos might use them. Now under the terms of the general OGL (a commercial product), I cannot mention the OTU at all. Under the FUP (a non-commercial product), I can't make reference to MGT rules. So my product is impermissable under those terms.
My question is: if I prefixed my discussion with,
"In their explorations of the Foreven Sector, the Zhodani and the Imperium use the following sensor systems in very specific ways...", would that invoke the 'Foreven Clause' and become allowed either commercially or non-commercially?
I could do this a different way. I could produce an extended adventure set in Foreven, with a detailed appendix introducing new rules about sensor equipment, essentially bundling my above product with a Foreven adventure. It seems right now that this would be permissible.
Note, none of my examples are intended as bad faith interpretations of the upcoming policies, but honest conundrums when faced with compliance.
A second query. If I, trading under a company name, commercially produce a non-OTU OGL product, would I then be able to refer to that product in a free OTU product made under the FUP. Would I be even able to mention one in the other in a list of the products I might have available under my company?
My questions may be premature, given that the final pdfs are imminent, but I might not have the time to consider my queries as fully as I can today due to real life being too interesting right now, in the Chinese proverb kind of way.
); as a preserve, Foreven is great for the spinwards style OTU development....but if it's the same as the one on the map -ie has a nailed down position, any of the rim/trailingword style development will have to stretch pretty badly to remain OTU (lost K'kree colonies ? Hmmm. ); has there been some consideration of " the other side" for fan/3rdparty development ? 
