Scout Errata - Submissions Sought

[MongooseMatt]

Many thanks to everyone who contributed to the High Guard errata (especially to those three chaps who emailed me extensive Word documents!). All the data is now being compiled and a PDF should be up soon.

No huge game changing modifications are required - the biggest seems to be that particle beams now have a limit of one per turret, but still require a triple turret.

Next up is Scout - I am not aware of anything massively wrong with this book, but while we are on a roll we might as well give it a look! All comets on Scout will be appreciated.

 

[AndrewW]

Many thanks to everyone who contributed to the High Guard errata (especially to those three chaps who emailed me extensive Word documents!). All the data is now being compiled and a PDF should be up soon.

Hey, mine wasn't a word document but it was extensive...

Next up is Scout - I am not aware of anything massively wrong with this book, but while we are on a roll we might as well give it a look! All comets on Scout will be appreciated.

Yeah, didn't look anywhere near as much as High Guard needed. Though did spot a few things originally, guess I need to go back over it and note them.

 

[alex_greene]

Next up is Scout - I am not aware of anything massively wrong with this book, but while we are on a roll we might as well give it a look! All comets on Scout will be appreciated.

I'll go and look up Scout and offer my comments accordingly.

 

[nats]

Dont know about Scout but Agent has a sentence cut short with a table over the end of it. Doesnt anyone proof read these books before they actually get printed? Things like this should not get through the net. I feel like taking my book back for a refund.

 

[AndrewW]

Dont know about Scout but Agent has a sentence cut short with a table over the end of it. Doesnt anyone proof read these books before they actually get printed? Things like this should not get through the net. I feel like taking my book back for a refund.

Yes Mongoose does use a proofreader, though some of the earlier ones didn't. But things can get missed at times. They do offer a refund.

 

[MongooseMatt]

But things can get missed at times. They do offer a refund.

Indeed. On both counts.

 

[lastbesthope]

Dont know about Scout but Agent has a sentence cut short with a table over the end of it. Doesnt anyone proof read these books before they actually get printed? Things like this should not get through the net. I feel like taking my book back for a refund.

You should send the exact details of that to msprange so they can include it in the no doubt upcoming Agent errata.

LBH

 

[nats]

In Book5: Agent on page 81 - the sentence about determining agent success failure has been cut off with the anti corporate mission payout over it. This table requires some kind of DM to get the throw to less than 2 or more than 12 (14+ possible) - I assume the DM is that from the anti corporate mission difficulty table but I could be wrong. Either way the end of the sentence is cut off.