It's best for all concerned if we don't mention what Conan was.
You didn't like the original Conan (the one with James Earl Jones, not the wholy unpleasant second movie, Conan the Destroyer)? Wow. Well, let's just agree to disagree, then. :?
It's best for all concerned if we don't mention what Conan was.
homerjsinnott said:SteveMND said:You know, altho I personally have no desire to play a Conan-based RPG, I do find it interesting that whenever I thought of the old Second Edition D&D, my mental picture went to that of the movie Excalibur. Yet when I thought of RuneQuest, I alway associated it with the movie Conan: the Barbarian.![]()
But Excalibur was a great film.
It's best for all concerned if we don't mention what Conan was.
andakitty said:I thought both Excalibur and the original Conan were great movies, and that both were very, very deeply flawed. And anyone who liked either one has a great deal in common...
Jandar said:This theoretically increases the scale up to 500%. (SB itself makes fun of this rule a few times, in that the sword Stormbringer is listed with an 880% skill in "Wielding Itself".)
Adept said:Jandar said:This theoretically increases the scale up to 500%. (SB itself makes fun of this rule a few times, in that the sword Stormbringer is listed with an 880% skill in "Wielding Itself".)
I don't like Stormbriger myself, ar at least "Elric!", the version I have.
The demon weapons are way over the top, especially Stormbringer*, and the magic system is really lame. The so called powerful sorcerer's have puny spirit-magic-like spells, the effects of which mostly mean nothing when compared to even low level demon tools.
Not a good combination
*That is, Strormbringer and the other demon tools aren't that rediculously powerful in the books themselves. It's rather like Sandy Petersen's take on the Cthulu mythos creatures vs. Lovecraft's books.
HyrumOWC said:Skills over 100 are addressed, they even mention skills of 300%.
Hyrum.
Archer said:Perhaps you never have read the books?
Archer said:...And that is probably why there is no real rules for them in the first place.
Archer said:And that Stormbringer should be redicilously powerful, that is a given. Just as Cthulu in CoC should be redicilously powerful. It is not as if the player characters are expected to be able to get their hands on stormbringer and wield it.
As a weapon made to kill gods, it's stats are probably only included because it exist in the setting.
Adept said:Archer said:Perhaps you never have read the books?
Not all of them, but enough of them to have a feel for the saga and setting. I'm not a big fan though.
Adept said:Archer said:...And that is probably why there is no real rules for them in the first place.
And yet some people here call Stormbringer "the best incarnation of the RQ rules ever"? I'm not convinced.
Adept said:Archer said:And that Stormbringer should be redicilously powerful, that is a given. Just as Cthulu in CoC should be redicilously powerful. It is not as if the player characters are expected to be able to get their hands on stormbringer and wield it.
As a weapon made to kill gods, it's stats are probably only included because it exist in the setting.
And yet in the stories it's not nearly as powerful as in the game. Elric has trouble getting through armour with Stormbringer on several occasions, both against thick shelled beetles and demon armour. It's a spiffy magical sword, but the treatment in the game is poor and very super-Rune-Quest in style.
Adept said:The same on CoC. The treatment on the mythos creatures is not one I enjoy. Everything is inflated in power and toughness. The same problem is seen early in sandy's Glorantha material. Especially the various creatures and monsters.
andakitty said:Oh, forgot the point of the previous post. One of the settings that the SB5 rules do best is Hyboria, not the Young Kingdoms. With very little alteration and 'fitting' they are in my opinion the very best rules for Conan games. So far, bar none.![]()
The same on CoC. The treatment on the mythos creatures is not one I enjoy. Everything is inflated in power and toughness.
andakitty said:If only it didn't suffer from Gygax's writing style. 'Avatars' indeed. I looked at it, and serously considered it but couldn't get around that or what looked like a way oversimplified combat system, IMO. Just too much that seemed changed for no other reason than to look different. And 'oafs' for a race? :roll: