Proof of intelligent design in ACTA????

[lastbesthope]

I did some analysis of the geometry of Fleet Carriers on a standard game table. Results were obvious when I looked at them. Now if only my favourite facctions carrier didn't have such a good reason to keep moving.

Well done Matt, assuming it was intentional.... :wink:

LBH

 

[Da Boss]

what are you on about ?

Fleet Carrier is great - has been for quite some time :?

 

[lastbesthope]

Oh I know Fleet Carrier is great, though I've never played with one. But look at the geometry of the trait and it's interaction on a standard size table.

It's genius.

LBH

 

[Da Boss]

sorry you talking beyond / above me - I'm here to blow stuff up

As a well know Centauri commander said "Hawk Wing - DIVVVVEEEEEEE"

 

[lastbesthope]

Well I seem to have kept my hints elusive enough to not give everyone the hint. Excellent.

LBH
(Mulling a tactics guide for ACTA article for S&P)

 

[EDFDarkAngel1]

He's speaking in tongues.

GET HIM!

Dark Angel

 

[David Anla Shok']

He's speaking in tongues.

GET HIM!

Dark Angel

Check his tea!

 

[Proteus454]

Does it spell out "bottom"?
It totally does, doesn't it?

 

[Jal]

he`s a loony... and a moderator.

go figure.

 

[David Anla Shok']

he`s a loony... and a moderator.

go figure.

Trying to run up his post count until they award him with "Ultimatus Mongooses"?

 

[Burger]

Is there a point to this thread or is it just yet another postwhore thread?
Shouldn't it be "moderated" or moved to off-topic since it is simply spam?

 

[Nomad]

It's something to do with the radius of effect of the Fleet Carrier trait (30" IIRC) and its area of coverage on a 'standard size' table, whatever 'standard size' is.

 

[Centauri_Admiral]

Definetly a postwhore thread . . . . . . . hang on; what am I doing here? I don't bother over analysing rules, I prefere the cold hard reasoning of tactical experience, earned from victory on the field of battle.

 

[greenboy]

what size si a standard size table it is one of the thing i would have liked to see in the new rule book

 

[H]

6*4
does it not say in the rulebook.
a quick look at the starting positions and things implies it

 

[lastbesthope]

It's something to do with the radius of effect of the Fleet Carrier trait (30" IIRC) and its area of coverage on a 'standard size' table, whatever 'standard size' is.

Indeed.

And from the looks of it more postwhoring is done on threads by people accusing me of postwhoring than by me.

LBH

 

[David Anla Shok']

Is there a point to this thread or is it just yet another postwhore thread?
Shouldn't it be "moderated" or moved to off-topic since it is simply spam?

You say that like a bad thing?

 

[Shadow Queen]

He's speaking in tongues.

GET HIM!

Dark Angel

Check his tea!

Iron Bru is more LBH's drink. ... He could be a Vorlon carrier

 

[emperorpenguin]

And from the looks of it more postwhoring is done on threads by people accusing me of postwhoring than by me.

LBH

I agree, this place is full of pots and kettles and i'm hearing a lot of "black"

but for once LBH (joking aside) you do seem to be making a lot of very random threads lately (and I thought that was Lt.Dee's job....)

 

[lastbesthope]

Iron Bru is more LBH's drink. ... He could be a Vorlon carrier

No, Irn-Bru is my drink, if you don't spell it right, it's not the same thing.

LBH