Narn Ka'Bin'Tak Super Dreadnought
- Thread starter alien027
- Start date
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
None of which is relevent to a discussion of the beams. :roll:
The Omega's secondary weapons are better, anyway. Better range, and TL up front even if not on the flanks.
The Omega's secondary weapons are better, anyway. Better range, and TL up front even if not on the flanks.
true but doesnt have as many, g'quan has twin linked all round, plus a secondary battery. you can only have so many guns. it already outguns the omega in secondaries by quite a margin. it has a TD e-mine and a decent (4AD) beam. but if its beam was as good as the omegas it would be over the top.
Morgoth
Mongoose
The fact that the beams for both races wil lbe possible for Front Arc is a definite bonus though and a good thing to aim for in campaigns. It will make both ships pretty mean!! Although I would of liked to see a lot less Boresight weaponary I am pretty happy with this compromise. Ships with the refit would prove to nasty surprises fro their foes!! 
and have the entire EA/narn fleet full of foreward arc beams by campaign turn 3.
that would be the 1st one they would save for.
the centauri would be all saving for shadow tech and dodges.
minbari would have +1 stealth on everything.
ISA precise secondary weapons and the mini beam (if its still there).
and so on and so forth. would get same combos over and over again, much like you do in 40k/warhammer with wargear/magic items.
that would be the 1st one they would save for.
the centauri would be all saving for shadow tech and dodges.
minbari would have +1 stealth on everything.
ISA precise secondary weapons and the mini beam (if its still there).
and so on and so forth. would get same combos over and over again, much like you do in 40k/warhammer with wargear/magic items.
MustEatBrains
Mongoose
Why not keep them random? Even a weal upgrade means that the ship is that much better than before; maybe not optimized, but still an improvement.
MustEatBrains
Mongoose
Burger said:
But maybe you´re just not the average gamer... :roll: but no, you´re right, with some thought I´m sure there would be many interesting combinations, but most players will tend to maximise their strengths
you go away for a turn and come back with 3 additional refits (rerolling any 12s)Methos5000
Mongoose
Are the all the downgrade refits gone? Like the Fast loading missle racks that cut your AD in half, or the Weapons that gain DD but its AD are cut in half (not bad if you only have a few attack dice to begin with but with large quanties of attack dice suddenly getting cut in have it actually reduces your battle effectiveness since you will be doing less crits now.
Plus for the missile racks I dont consider 2AD every turn to be an upgrade over 4AD over two turns, it come out to average 2AD every turn so how is that an upgrade?
And what about reinforced hull 'refit' for the ISA? a 10% upgrade (meaning one more damage for a whitestar) for a 1 point speed reduction is a downgrade for ships that rely on speed, plus in my experience the damage increase is less important for the ISA since they have self repair and most of my whitestars usually end up decrewed instead of destroyed.
Plus for the missile racks I dont consider 2AD every turn to be an upgrade over 4AD over two turns, it come out to average 2AD every turn so how is that an upgrade?
And what about reinforced hull 'refit' for the ISA? a 10% upgrade (meaning one more damage for a whitestar) for a 1 point speed reduction is a downgrade for ships that rely on speed, plus in my experience the damage increase is less important for the ISA since they have self repair and most of my whitestars usually end up decrewed instead of destroyed.
