Lance Corporals

aspqrz

Mongoose
While everyone's been raving about 760 Patrons and, indeed, I see it as likely being generally useful ... I have some reservations.

For example ...

Page #26: [22-23A] Lance Corporal

Who is described as a "middle ranked officer" who has "crawled over the demotions of his fellows on his rise to the top" ...

Which, to put it mildly, shows a regrettable lack of anything resembling even the most basic of knowledge of military ranks.

Unless, of course, in the Imperial Military, Lance Corporals are rather different to what they are in those world militaries that still have them ... the lowest of the low, one step above Private, and a *non-commissioned* officer which makes them no officer at all.

Certainly not "middle ranked" and how they could crawl over the demotions of others in their rise to the absolute bottom of the heap! Well, it beggars belief :shock:

Then, for the first mission profile:

"... arranging for a high profile mission for whom he needs patsies ..."

Sorry. Nope.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Corporal for current usages

Lance Corporals might be able to arrange for a corkscrew for a Bottle Party in a Brewery as they are not Leftenants, but I doubt that that qualifies as a "high profile mission".

YMMV, of course ... Breweries are important Military Objectives ... why, when I was in the Signals Platoon for the Sydney University Regiment (Citizen Military Forces, in those days, not Army Reserve), we had our very own special, secret, code for such things ... so as to not worry the poor Leftenants and other Officers with too much to think about :wink:

However, our Lance Corporals certainly didn't arrange anything much at all ... except Latrine duty, perhaps :lol:

A minor thing, and easily ignored ... he'll be a Sub-Leftenant (or the like) any time he's rolled in my game, but moderately annoying nonetheless.

Phil
 
I wonder if someone messed up an abbreviation of Lieutenant Colonel. A bit of a stretch, but it looks closer to the mark. :)
 
aspqrz said:
Gruffty the Hiver said:
aspqrz said:
they are not Leftenants
not worry the poor Leftenants
he'll be a Sub-Leftenant
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: LMFAO Teh Queen's English, doncherknow :mrgreen:

Yep.

Proper armies, even if colonials, don't have officers who live in sanitation waste facilities* :D

Phil

* Loo Tenants
Super-Mega-ROTFLMFAO :mrgreen:

No Loo-tenant Dans here... ;)
 
I wonder more why any proper modern army, colonial or not, might want
to arm their corporals with lances ... :shock:
 
rust said:
I wonder more why any proper modern army, colonial or not, might want
to arm their corporals with lances ... :shock:

How about Hauptgefreiters ... "Lance Corporals" according to Wikipedia ... and I think we can agree that the Heer is a "proper modern army", can't we :D

Phil
 
aspqrz said:
How about Hauptgefreiters ...

I liked those guys who always had to carry a staff (German: Stab) with
them, like Stabsgefreiter or Stabsunteroffizier.

You know, carry a big stick ... :D
 
The crawling over others to rise to the "top" applied to Lance Corporals makes me think of the old saw about the most vicious feuding precisely because the stakes are so low.
 
Deniable said:
I wonder if someone messed up an abbreviation of Lieutenant Colonel. A bit of a stretch, but it looks closer to the mark. :)
I have already crossed mine out and wrote Lieutenant Colonel as it makes much more sense.

Daniel
 
Gruffty the Hiver said:
Maybe the mistake arose from using "LC" for Lieutenant Colonel instead of Lt. Col in a manuscript somewhere? :)
Yep, I think that is what we are saying. :D

Daniel
 
-Daniel- said:
Deniable said:
I wonder if someone messed up an abbreviation of Lieutenant Colonel. A bit of a stretch, but it looks closer to the mark. :)
I have already crossed mine out and wrote Lieutenant Colonel as it makes much more sense.

Ah. Yes. As Gruffty says ... LC instead of Lt. Col. ... makes sense. :wink:

Phl
 
Back
Top