Condottiere
Emperor Mongoose
The book cover creates the ambiance and expectation.
Very little to do with the mechanical rules, but a lot to do with how the core rules are presented. And maybe to do with how a lot of adventures are set up.Okay, but what does that have to do with the rules set? Sure, you can do Aliens: The RPG and be like "you are making characters who are gonna go somewhere and try not to die". Focused games like that are okay if that's what you want to play. And you put them back on the shelf and play something else if you don't.
I guess I don't get what you want the core rules to do that isn't there? The more specific the outcomes are, the less flexible the game is. Ancients requires different stuff than Pirates of Drinax, which requires different stuff than Deepnight. Or the Traveller Adventure. Or a Naval Campaign.
Traveller can run Firefly or Babylon 5 or Lt. Leary. The table is deciding what they want to do, whether that's a sandbox or adventure path. Maybe I'm missing something, but I've never felt like Traveller was telling me I couldn't do something I wanted to do. Or forced me to do something I didn't want to do.
Pick a spot, one where nerds may congregate. Then do your demo there. Advertise it in nerd spaces online and in real life. Show up regularly, like once a month to run the demo. It doesn't take that much effort.I like it. I'd put a bit more space between paragraphs. If I was to be running a game beyond my existing gaming circle, I'd probably want to tailor the third paragraph to reflect the adventures I intended to run.
When it comes to FLGS. They are quite a fair distance from where we normally play. To run a demo session, you're looking at a round trip journey in 2 cars, plus parking, plus beverages and nibbles for everyone involved. There would have to be some kind of incentive for the players to make up for the disruption to their already busy lives.
This is very easy to do. Every career Event, connection, etc, is given a place on the map, a relevant company, person, etc. Whether it’s Travellermap, or a home brew setting.The total failure of the Traveller chargen rules to connect player characters to the society they live in.
So how does your critique of the Charted Space setting prevent running a demo session like the one I described upthread?The Third Imperium setting is the problem.
there is no society to fit into because very planet it its own society and "the Imperuim rules the space between the stars" (rubbish but that is a different argument)
Where is the Imperial society that the ex-Imperial services career character can be part of? Make two jumps and you are on a new planet with completely different society, culture, laws etc... there is no overarching Imperial society (I would argue that there is but it has never been developed in any meaningful way). Where is the "free traders" guild? Where is the "mercenary's guild"?
The Third Imperium is not the Empire of Star Wars, nor does it have Star Wars tech tropes despite Mongoose shoehorning them in because that is the setting they want. That said do you really think a potential Traveller customer is looking for a Star Wars with the serial numbers filed off setting? Is making the Charted Space setting a melting pot for every Mongoose Traveller rules, equipment item and technology option a playable setting?
"Traveller is necessarily a framework describing the barest of essentials for an infinite universe;* obviously rules which could cover every aspect of every possible action would be far larger than these three booklets. A group involved in playing a scenario or campaign can make their adventures more elaborate, more detailed, more interesting, with the input of a great deal of imagination.
The greatest burden, of course, falls on the referee, who must create entire worlds and societies through which the players will roam. One very interesting source of assistance for this task is the existing science-fiction literature. Virtually anything mentioned in a story or article can be transferred to the Traveller environment. Orbital cities, nuclear war, alien societies, puzzles, enigmas, absolutely anything can occur, with imagination being the only limit.**
The players themselves have a burden almost equal to that of the referee: they must move, act, travel in search of their own goals. The typical methods used in life by 20th century Terrans (thrift, dedication, and hard work) do not work in Traveller; instead, travellers must boldly plan and execute daring schemes for the acquisition of wealth and power***. As for the referee, modern science-fiction tradition provides many ideas and concepts to be imitated.
Above all, the players and the referees must work together. Care must be taken that the referee does not simply lay fortunes in the path of the players, but the situation is not primarily an adversary relationship. The referee simply administers the rules in situations where the players themselves have an incomplete understanding of the universe. The results should reflect a consistent reality.
Welcome to the universe of Traveller!"
*the Imperium as an example of how to run your own setting would come later
** sadly as soon as you have an "official" setting you have introduced limits
*** they don't have to be criminal though...
Well, I agree that Mongoose's efforts in the way of campaign guides are not as good as they could be. The Naval Campaign Guide is okay, but buried in an expensive box that most people probably don't have any use for. The Mercenary Campaign Guide is flawed in execution. The Deep Space exploration set doesn't really address running a campaign of that so much as just provides pieces you can use if you already know what you want to do. And the Trader campaign has nothing whatsoever about how to run in practice, just some tables that do more to lead people astray than guide how to run a viable campaign. And I'm sure there are plenty of people who would love a campaign guide for doing a colony building campaign. Space Hobos is the default in Traveller only in the sense that the vast majority of RPGs assume the characters are 'for hire' adventurers.Very little to do with the mechanical rules, but a lot to do with how the core rules are presented. And maybe to do with how a lot of adventures are set up.
I'm not FULLY agreeing with Actionman that MGT2e assumes space hobos. As I did mention, the CRB seems much more focussed on enabling the Trader Campaign to me. But he's got grounds for his point of view. There could be more discussion about running a campaign, and mostly what is presented outside the Trading stuff is random patron jobs and combat.
Well, the current ones do tell you how to tie the player characters into Greyhawk.Well, I agree that Mongoose's efforts in the way of campaign guides are not as good as they could be. The Naval Campaign Guide is okay, but buried in an expensive box that most people probably don't have any use for. The Mercenary Campaign Guide is flawed in execution. The Deep Space exploration set doesn't really address running a campaign of that so much as just provides pieces you can use if you already know what you want to do. And the Trader campaign has nothing whatsoever about how to run in practice, just some tables that do more to lead people astray than guide how to run a viable campaign. And I'm sure there are plenty of people who would love a campaign guide for doing a colony building campaign. Space Hobos is the default in Traveller only in the sense that the vast majority of RPGs assume the characters are 'for hire' adventurers.
I also agree that there should be a CHARTED SPACE SOURCEBOOK just as much as there is one for 2300. And as I said when it came out, Charted Space could use a lot more stuff like "The Borderlands" that is an area and how to play in it instead of the traditional sector books that mostly ignore the question of why you'd pick this place to set your campaign and what's uniquely playable here.
I don't think that Traveller is the Charted Space RPG. So I don't think the Core rules should be even further bound to that setting. The D&D core rules don't tell you how to tie your characters into the organizations of the Forgotten Realms either.
The Third Imperium setting is the problem.
They may do this, although they haven’t before and while the default or example setting in the DMG is the World of Greyhawk, the brand that sold the recent D&D movie was based in the Forgotten Realms.Well, the current ones do tell you how to tie the player characters into Greyhawk.

I entirely agree: of course there isn't! There are just a small handful of forum posters who insist non-stop - with zero evidence - that what Traveller needs is either to be system neutral (ignoring that most humans engage with narrative, not rules) or to act like TSR in the years running up to bankruptcy when they split their audience into tiny sects, each playing different settings (and not buying the other settings).There isn’t really much evidence that the connection between Traveller and Charted Space harms sales, marketing or the Traveller brand.
Very few people are arguing that Charted Space is a bad thing or that it should have no settings at all. Actually, the argument is that Charted Space is harmed by being the default Traveller setting, so that anything you want to add to the Traveller rules gets treated by default as belonging in Charted Space.They may do this, although they haven’t before and while the default or example setting in the DMG is the World of Greyhawk, the brand that sold the recent D&D movie was based in the Forgotten Realms.
Forgotten Realms is similar to Charted Space, however, because it is essentially a loose setting that remains generic enough to allow for a wide number of stories. Both Forgotten Realms and the Third Imperium actually predate D&D and Traveller respectively though, but have since become default settings. As I said above, I don’t have a problem with having a default setting, with implications in the rules of how this plays out. I also prefer, and have argued a lot for, alternative settings having their own core rules books as standalone.
There isn’t really much evidence that the connection between Traveller and Charted Space harms sales, marketing or the Traveller brand. Indeed, when I look at things like this:
View attachment 6906
….I actually think Traveller looks quite cool….
To reiterate, I don’t think having a default setting is really anything to do with making the game more popular. It is a feature of the game, not a hindrance. The hindrance is a lack of awareness amongst potential fans - as I say, the game needs to be made more available with a structured, organised approach to increase participation.
This is very easy to do. Every career Event, connection, etc, is given a place on the map, a relevant company, person, etc. Whether it’s Travellermap, or a home brew setting.
Granted, a line in the rules suggesting such would be a great add.
I have about a sub-sector worth of systems almost all non aligned with mostly TL 5 - 9, a few between that and 15 and one 15. They are scattered.But you know what would suffice? One interesting solar system or a small cluster of them. That's what Firefly did.
This is all based on personal anecdotes though. I don’t see many new players, myself, in the interactions I’ve had with them, that are actually that fussed. Moreover, the game system already does support multiple settings so all of this seems like a moot point to me.Very few people are arguing that Charted Space is a bad thing or that it should have no settings at all. Actually, the argument is that Charted Space is harmed by being the default Traveller setting, so that anything you want to add to the Traveller rules gets treated by default as belonging in Charted Space.
So when you want alternate FTL technologies, advanced AI, robot PCs, new aliens, funky new weapons systems, or any of the many things that Traveller can easily support, they automatically get included into Charted Space.
The rules on empty hex exploration are great. But they also make a mockery of the idea that the Rifts are actually barriers the way they are presented in Charted Space. Likewise, personal energy shields, ion cannons, and all kinds of other cool stuff that absolutely belong in the rules.
Charted Space is a great thing, but you want people to know that they can play things other than Charted Space with Traveller. Just like you can play D&D without using the Forgotten Realms. Because no setting suits everyone.
When talking to people who have heard of Traveller, it's very rarely anything about the *rules* that they have concerns about. Some don't like the idea of the semi-random character background, but I get a lot more guff about Charted Space's particular tropes, as if you had to adopt those to use Traveller.
I want people to know that they can use Traveller to play Space: Above & Beyond or Firefly or Earth 2, or The Expanse, or Star Trek, or Star Wars or The Culture or Stargate if that's their jam. Because you can. You can also take advantage of all the coolness that is in Charted Space if that's your jam.
there is no society to fit into because very planet it its own society and "the Imperuim rules the space between the stars" (rubbish but that is a different argument)
Where is the Imperial society that the ex-Imperial services career character can be part of? Make two jumps and you are on a new planet with completely different society, culture, laws etc... there is no overarching Imperial society (I would argue that there is but it has never been developed in any meaningful way). Where is the "free traders" guild? Where is the "mercenary's guild"?
It isn't about supporting settings. It's about Mongoose creating multiple settings that are popular. Like the owners of D&D did.Moreover, the game system already does support multiple settings so all of this seems like a moot point to me.
Exactly. The Borderlands supplement or the Aramis Trace from The Traveller Adventure are excellent small areas that you can easily restrict by only having a J1 or J2 ship. If you are a bit more ambitious, you can do an isolated area like the Islands subsectors, which is about 2 dozen worlds. I talked that up a lot when Borderlands came out.The problem probably isn't the 3I at all, but the default SCOPE of general Traveller (which the 3I is the result of).
A subsector has 80 hexes, usually around 30-50 systems. That's a LOT of map, and travel between systems is in practice easy, despite lingering influences from Dumarest.
But wait! Subsector implies a Sector... so here you go - 15 more of them. And why not keep on with that... have another Sector. And another. And another.
But you know what would suffice? One interesting solar system or a small cluster of them. That's what Firefly did. That's what the Expanse does. That's what Starfinder does in the core book. Yes, Traveller provides the tools in CRB to roll up a planet, but not a system. But rolling up their own worlds is probably not what most people want anyway (the posters on this forum are likely an exception, but this thread is about attracting general gamers). A well fleshed out series of star systems (or one really good one) is probably the meat that other games provide that Traveller has historically lacked. When Traveller HAS done a focus system, it's never been a hub. Tarsus and Beltstrike are in District 268, for example.
How can you really have a setting hub with such an enormous map?
Traveller's default mode isn't space hobos as such, but it IS Planet of the Week. Whether Trader, Military, Explorer or Jobs For Hire Drifters, it's expected that the characters will travel, and because the tools are provided to easily create world after world after world, that's what usually happens.
Maybe it's time for a version of the game whose setting's focus ISN'T system hopping, but in-system or cluster based, allowing for deeper lore? I suspect Mongoose already realise this - Pioneer is such a project, Cluster Truck is such a project.
They do already.It isn't about supporting settings. It's about Mongoose creating multiple settings that are popular. Like the owners of D&D did.