How to make Traveller more popular with TTRPG players

[JupiterIndustries]

You mean theft, theft, theft?

I was always wondering why he was so sweaty during that, besides all the jumping around.

 

[MarcusIII]

Hopefully people are over the angst and misplaced anger about a new setting for Traveller. So, let's press on.


A long time from now in a galaxy
not far away…

So Traveller could make a Star Wars type setting. It’s just about two factions of Wizards in space. Good vs. evil with rogues thrown in. It’s not about commerce so ships are cheap,
"Ten thousand? We could almost buy our own ship for that!”.

Emphasize the psionics rules, make hand blaster, et al. They can drop the Jim Henson characters. May just a Can Can Blinks. Or, a bloated Kermit the Frog as a smuggling mob leader. Lighting katanas instead of sabers because Jap stuff is cooler.
Hell, make the artwork anime for the setting.

 

[MarcusIII]

I think this is only partially true. There are several distinct settings for Traveller:

Those are all in the 3I pretty much which IS the setting. They are different editions of the rules not differnt settings.

 

[Vormaerin]

Mindjammer is not. 2300 is not. Pioneer is not. The various 3rd party settings are not.

One of GDW's problems was that they kept destroying the 3I to create their new setting instead of just putting out a separate Space Vikings! setting, for example.

 

[MarcusIII]

Mindjammer is not. 2300 is not. Pioneer is not. The various 3rd party settings are not.

One of GDW's problems was that they kept destroying the 3I to create their new setting instead of just putting out a separate Space Vikings! setting, for example.

Mindjammer isn't a Traveller product. 2300 IS set in the same space as the 3I. Pioneer is also set in the Sol system which is part of the 3I setting. It would be like WotC putting out an edition set in a small part of Greyhawk like the Iron hills 3,000 years before the published timeline of Greyhawk. Same setting different era.

 

[MarcusIII]

One of GDW's problems was that they kept destroying the 3I to create their new setting instead of just putting out a separate Space Vikings! setting, for example.

so true

 

[Studio Cat]

Hopefully people are over the angst and misplaced anger about a new setting for Traveller. So, let's press on.

No, because you have a Gross Conceptual Error going on.

 

[Studio Cat]

Mindjammer isn't a Traveller product. 2300 IS set in the same space as the 3I. Pioneer is also set in the Sol system which is part of the 3I setting. It would be like WotC putting out an edition set in a small part of Greyhawk like the Iron hills 3,000 years before the published timeline of Greyhawk. Same setting different era.

And this is it. This statement demonstrates how little knowledge you have of 2300AD, the OTU, and Pioneer. Yes, Sol system is in all of them, but it is a different interpretation of Sol system in each one because they are different settings.

Now, are you interested in making Traveller more popular and attracting more Players or do you just want people to agree with your Gross Conceptual Error?

 

[MarcusIII]

No, because you have a Gross Conceptual Error going on.

Ya know most health insurance covers psychiatric care. Take advantage of it.

 

[Grognardia]

Ya know most health insurance covers psychiatric care. Take advantage of it.

Reported for member conflict.

 

[MarcusIII]

Now, Firefly is super easy to do with Traveller. Even to improve it is easy. You just make the situation interstellar in nature but only about a sub-sector in size.

 

[MarcusIII]

Reported for member conflict.

Make sure you avoid hypocrisy by reporting the other guy too.

 

[Grognardia]

Make sure you avoid hypocrisy by reporting the other guy too.

Why? He's correct. They're all different settings using more or less the same rules.