snrdg121408
Mongoose
Hello all,
I have walked through the Capital Ship Design Example again and checked the command bridge cost rules on HG 1e p. 44 with the Step 4 Command Bridge cost in the text on p. 70.
Bridge - Command Bridge right hand column p. 44:
"A command bridge costs 50% more than a conventional bridge of the same size. Capital ship command bridges take up 80 tons per section of ship and located in a single location (which may be separate from the main bridge)."
A 75,000 ton hull has four sections and a command bridge requires 80 tons of space for a total of 320 tons. The command bridge, per p. 44, cost is 50% more than a conventional bridge of the same size.
The conventional bridge in the example, p. 70, is 1,500 tons which is not the same size as the command bridge. The cost of a 320 ton conventional bridge is 320 x MCr0.5 = MCr160 x 1.5 = MCr240.
The Traveller HG 1e Errata does not indicate any corrections to either the Command Bridge rules or the Capital Ship Design Example.
In the example the 320 ton command bridge cost appears to have been calculated using the conventional bridge cost of MCr1,500 from the softcover and not the cost found in MgT1e Step 4 Summary So Far table or corrected cost from the Traveller HG 1e errata of MCr150.
Is the cost of a command bridge 50% greater than the cost of a conventional bridge the same size or the cost of the installed conventional bridge?
I have walked through the Capital Ship Design Example again and checked the command bridge cost rules on HG 1e p. 44 with the Step 4 Command Bridge cost in the text on p. 70.
Bridge - Command Bridge right hand column p. 44:
"A command bridge costs 50% more than a conventional bridge of the same size. Capital ship command bridges take up 80 tons per section of ship and located in a single location (which may be separate from the main bridge)."
A 75,000 ton hull has four sections and a command bridge requires 80 tons of space for a total of 320 tons. The command bridge, per p. 44, cost is 50% more than a conventional bridge of the same size.
The conventional bridge in the example, p. 70, is 1,500 tons which is not the same size as the command bridge. The cost of a 320 ton conventional bridge is 320 x MCr0.5 = MCr160 x 1.5 = MCr240.
The Traveller HG 1e Errata does not indicate any corrections to either the Command Bridge rules or the Capital Ship Design Example.
In the example the 320 ton command bridge cost appears to have been calculated using the conventional bridge cost of MCr1,500 from the softcover and not the cost found in MgT1e Step 4 Summary So Far table or corrected cost from the Traveller HG 1e errata of MCr150.
Is the cost of a command bridge 50% greater than the cost of a conventional bridge the same size or the cost of the installed conventional bridge?