Gauss Rifle

You could also track the magnetic pulse produced by the rifle. You'd need some sort of high tech sensor which is always on the lookout for such pulses, but if tracking the source of incoming fire requires such a sensor, be assured that someone's military budget will go towards developing it.

Locating the pulse will, of course, be easier if the rifle is on full automatic and continuing to produce pulses for a while.
 
Mongoose Pete said:
Its a good start, especially since it appears to be a home built project. However the demonstration range was maybe 3m and nothing was said about how many shots the battery could power. I think it'll take a TL or two to get the requisite energy density in the battery to produce a decent range and a large enough endurance to be useful. It might also take a further TL to handle the cooling requirements on the coil between shots.

Golan2072 said:
Its main advantage so far is that it is completely silent (apart from the impact itself, that is) and leaves no powder residue. If someone would make it much more compact, it could be an excellent assassin weapon... :twisted:
That gauss gun was 'silent' since the ammo was travelling slowly - which would be perfect for something like a close range pistol, particularly an assassins weapon as Golan suggested. For battlefield weapons designed to overcome armour you'll need something with more omph.

Traveller versions use smaller calibre rounds which (depending on shape and mass) would require accelerations at perhaps near hypersonic velocities(*) to inflict damage equivalent to a propellant based weapon. Thus unless the needles have some sort of hi-tech noise suppressing aerodynamic profile, they will produce a discernible cracking signature. Sound volume will depend on velocity, profile and rate of fire of the dart/needle, but in general should be quieter than a firearm. However since the noise will be produced along its flight path, it might be difficult for sensor-less targets to locate the origin of the shot.

(*) Of course, depending on how fast the projectile is travelling it could have a serious thermal signature, possibly even igniting the air around itself and being visible as a flash line of fire in the case of support level or vehicle based gauss weapons.

In reality gauss weapons aren't really stealthy, but I'm fine with Traveller versions having high TL solutions to most of the problems. :)

Very interesting points. I've always characterized gauss weapons as being more "computerized" and "electronic" in general than more conventional firearms. While you would take a conventional firearm to a weaponsmith of some sort for modification or customization, you might take a gauss weapon to a computer engineer or programmer for modification- the idea being that with gauss firearms, the majority of adjustments needed would be in software.

"navy" versions of gauss pistols might be hardwired to fire it's projectiles at subsonic speeds with a lower voltage, reducing the chance of interior damage to a ship during a firing incident. Stealth operatives may ask for those same firmware settings, maybe tweaking settings for an increased capacitor recharge rate.
 
AdrianH said:
You could also track the magnetic pulse produced by the rifle. You'd need some sort of high tech sensor which is always on the lookout for such pulses, but if tracking the source of incoming fire requires such a sensor, be assured that someone's military budget will go towards developing it.
Which is why for Darrians I gave them Pulse Suppression systems for their gauss weapons, so they cannot be tracked by magnetic pulses. :D :wink:
 
far-trader said:
Treebore said:
Plus I have always believed "An armed society is a polite society." ever since I first read it in R. Heinlein's book.

One word. Somalia.

It's a neat political point, but like all such soundbites, entirely without merit.

Somalia is a bit more complex than that, and far from everyone was armed, so your point fails. Drug Lords and their lackeys were armed. the people they starved and killed and oppressed were not. So my belief still stands.
 
You guys do know that Gauss/Rail guns ARE already in existence, right? They are just big proto type guns that are still not practical to put in the battle field yet due to power needs are still too high to make them battle field practical. Plus a number of other hurdles still need to be overcome to make them superior to what is already in the field.

But basic and fully functioning Gauss/rail guns do exist.
 
Treebore said:
You guys do know that Gauss/Rail guns ARE already in existence, right? They are just big proto type guns that are still not practical to put in the battle field yet due to power needs are still too high to make them battle field practical. Plus a number of other hurdles still need to be overcome to make them superior to what is already in the field.

But basic and fully functioning Gauss/rail guns do exist.

I seem to remember reading a few years ago that the US Navy were experimenting with railguns.
 
Back
Top