Eberron->RQ2 conversion. Update Here!
- Thread starter Dan True
- Start date
Just read the magic section and i think is a great idea the new Advanced skill Magic Reserve. Don really master the system yet, and i dont know if this rule makes wizards uber powerful, but helps a lot to D&D settings.
BTW u have convinced me to use MRQ2 instead of BRP for my fantasy games. We love D&D settings (Eberron is so cool) but we always fin difficult to model the feeling with D100 games. Keep the cool work.
BTW u have convinced me to use MRQ2 instead of BRP for my fantasy games. We love D&D settings (Eberron is so cool) but we always fin difficult to model the feeling with D100 games. Keep the cool work.
I've added a chapter for Equipment. It's not completely done yet, but some weapons and armour have been added, and some materials. Please comment on what you think of the prices and rules for new weapons. Especially the prices for the materials, I am reworking them now but would still like some ideas.
- Dan
- Dan
diesalher said:
Yeah. The reason for lack of updates is that I have had few new large additions, other than equipment and Psionics I think. Instead most have focussed on filling holes, correcting mistakes, doing layout and adding magic items.
I just need to add new Heroic Abilitis, and I believe I will finish these this evening. Then the book should be ready for first "publishing"
My new campaign involving this starts at Sunday.
- Dan
Final pdf up. When initial comments/corrections are over I will move to a new thread and ask for a sticky.
As of now there may be some problems with printing, at least I had. Two printers both refused to print the whole document, and left white edges around the page. If anyone has any idea as to how to solve this, please left me know.
- Dan
As of now there may be some problems with printing, at least I had. Two printers both refused to print the whole document, and left white edges around the page. If anyone has any idea as to how to solve this, please left me know.
- Dan
Blackyinkin
Mongoose
Hi,
Okay I am being dumb, but where is the PDF? How do I access it?
Simon
Okay I am being dumb, but where is the PDF? How do I access it?
Simon
Lord High Munchkin
Mongoose
I suspect it has been stomped legally... the links have been "reserved".
Sorry, my bad. For some reason the first post was in bad syntax for some reason, and the whole post was not shown - I uploaded right before I left for gaming, so didn't notice it until now.
The pdf is up and running and I can access it through the link, so other should also be able.
I have found the first few errors, so please hit me with more so I can correct them all at once
- Dan
The pdf is up and running and I can access it through the link, so other should also be able.
I have found the first few errors, so please hit me with more so I can correct them all at once
- Dan
Updated the pdf! Added identification to artificers skills, and changed Magic Reserve to only grant half skill value as MP, instead of full (so 40% gives 20 MP). And fixed various typos.
Have removed the edges, as I realised most printers cannot print full-page anyway. If you would like a version with edges again, please ask.
Thanks Glad you like it. Please post any errors you find.
- Dan
Have removed the edges, as I realised most printers cannot print full-page anyway. If you would like a version with edges again, please ask.
Da Boss said:Just downloaded and at first read thought seems an excellent piece of work
I am playng around with a conversion myself of a home grown D20 world so this is most useful and inspirational
Thanks
Glad you like it. Please post any errors you find.- Dan
cthulhudarren
Mongoose
Comments:
Nice work! Opinions/thoughts:
1) 17 CON for Gnomes seems way too high. They shouldn't be more healthy than humans, bugbears, halflings, etc.
2) 7 CON for elves seems way too low. I'd go for 9-10.
2) Your example for converting DCs doesn't match your chart. Your chart shows 20 (difficult))as a different difficulty than your example paragraph (hard).
Nice work! Opinions/thoughts:
1) 17 CON for Gnomes seems way too high. They shouldn't be more healthy than humans, bugbears, halflings, etc.
2) 7 CON for elves seems way too low. I'd go for 9-10.
2) Your example for converting DCs doesn't match your chart. Your chart shows 20 (difficult))as a different difficulty than your example paragraph (hard).
cthulhudarren
Mongoose
'Dan True said:
I was also going to note that I think Bugbears and Gnolls should have more CON. I read somewhere that more HD in D&D loosely corresponds to more CON in MRQ2. CON should scale with HD. I'd expect Gnolls with 2HD should have > CON than humans, and Bugbears with 3HD > CON than gnolls.
Similar threads
