Does Mongoose update its PDFs with errata?

[nerfherder]

I have bought physical books in the past, but am becoming more interested in buying PDFs (for portability, storage, and new devices like the iPad making them more practical to use at the table).

All books have mistakes and, as a customer, I applaud Mongoose for recognising this and publishing errata.

So, my question is - does Mongoose apply the errata to its PDFs for sale?

I'm specifically interested in the RQ2 books right now - especially the core rulebook - but might be tempted back into Traveller in the future (no pun intended!).

Thanks.

 

[MongooseMatt]

Traveller and many of its supplements have been updated with errata.

RQ2 has had one round of errata and is currently awaiting another - there is not a huge amount though, to be honest, and we are just looking for some free time to update it.

So, in answer to your question, generally yes

 

[nerfherder]

Cool, thanks! 8)

 

[Morgan d'Barganfore]

You could run a topic on here that is purely to collect errata e.g. the rule-master topic can debate something and when it's got say a proposer and seconder then it can go into the errata topic.
Sort of fan short listing of potential errata for Mongoose to then review/approve. - Let the players do the work

 

[AndrewW]

You could run a topic on here that is purely to collect errata e.g. the rule-master topic can debate something and when it's got say a proposer and seconder then it can go into the errata topic.
Sort of fan short listing of potential errata for Mongoose to then review/approve. - Let the players do the work

That's been done at least somewhat with a topic posted in the Traveller section before the release of the LBB version of some books (such as High Guard).

 

[Morgan d'Barganfore]

Thx Andrew - I didn't know that as I only prowl the RQII/Wayfarer topics on here.
I know that it worked very well for Hackmaster though that I used to play. The company were always "we need to fins time to do errata" etc and then they put a dedicated thread in place which players debated etc and then moderator ran a separate (moderator only) list. I think it cited closed items that would be on next errata and a list of items on the "need debating"