Deck Plan: Subsidised Merchant Type R 'Fat Trader'

andrew boulton said:
That's really good!

Except...either the cargo decks are too tall or the top deck is too short. Something's wrong there.

Thanks, well my plans don't work, hence my original 3D model had the bridge deck shorter (as in the deckplans)
THis new model is more like fartraders and the ones in TNE/CT/GURPS books (image wise) lets face it the short top deck doesn't fit the images unless the end of the cargo hold aft is higher.

I wonder if the plans are correct in regards to the number of square vs tons..?

I'll measure it later, its been rescaled, prodded and move alot since I did the plans!
 
andrew boulton said:
No, I mean if the cargo doors are two decks high then only midgets would fit on the top deck!

Aaa phew, see that what -4 hours sleep gets me. I'll measure it up - easy to fix!

:)
 
It looks pretty interesting in its Obese-trader form. Out of curiosity, do you know what the internal dtons are as it makes an interesting looking ship in its own right.
 
Silvereye said:
It looks pretty interesting in its Obese-trader form. Out of curiosity, do you know what the internal dtons are as it makes an interesting looking ship in its own right.

'fraid I don't but as the image is in meters I can give you the sizes, perhaps from that you can figure the internal/size?
 
Measurements:
49.59m Long
23m Wide
Front section (rounded bit) is about 8.5m from the nose inwards.

Wingspan 51.46m
Intake to intake 23mm

10.66m Tall
11.17m Tall at the launch dock

Intakes approx 15mm long

All aprox...

I am thinking of doing this as new ship, how do you think it can better the exising ship? Launch Hanger? Bigger Engines? Far Fat Trader :)
 
middenface said:
Measurements:
49.59m Long
23m Wide
Front section (rounded bit) is about 8.5m from the nose inwards.

Wingspan 51.46m
Intake to intake 23mm

10.66m Tall
11.17m Tall at the launch dock

Intakes approx 15mm long

All aprox...

I am thinking of doing this as new ship, how do you think it can better the exising ship? Launch Hanger? Bigger Engines? Far Fat Trader :)

Are the millimeter measurements meant to read meters? I don't think many mm measurements would show up in cursory examinations.

As far as a re-design, I think any subsidized ship is meant to be relatively cheap and simple. So probably its going to be slow, ugly, but functional and able to turn a profit. Maybe something that is more slab-sided and less aerodynamic. Cargo access maybe limited to a single large opening that would allow access to the primary cargo hold with larger cargo's. If you are making it a pure cargo ship, eliminate the passenger quarters and launch and have it be just a pure cargo ship.
 
Doh, all measurements are in Metres... So damn hot in here, brain melting coolant failure imminent...

Hmmm a cargo only version... I was thinking of keeping the shape, heck I like it too much.. but your slabby version has merit, mind you I thinks it been done.
 
middenface said:
3view.jpg

49.59m Long
23m Wide
Front section (rounded bit) is about 8.5m from the nose inwards.

Wingspan 51.46m
Intake to intake 23mm

10.66m Tall
11.17m Tall at the launch dock

Intakes approx 15m long

I am thinking of doing this as new ship, how do you think it can better the exising ship? Launch Hanger? Bigger Engines? Far Fat Trader :)

Definietly do it as a new ship. It's too interesting to let go to waste.

I'd increase the overall height to ~12-13m meaning you will get 4 decks. The lower three would be a cavernous amount of cargo space and fuel. The upper deack then gives you quite a reasonable amount of crew and passenger space, and maybe a closed hanger for the launch. The engine pods should give you space for engines and powerplants (2 decks). The fuel could probably be squezed into the curve of the hull around the cargo bay.

There is also nothing to stop you lengthening the hull a touch if you need a little extra space for gubbins
 
middenface said:
Doh, all measurements are in Metres... So damn hot in here, brain melting coolant failure imminent...

Hmmm a cargo only version... I was thinking of keeping the shape, heck I like it too much.. but your slabby version has merit, mind you I thinks it been done.

Oh, I thought you were going to design us a new ship from the ground up! If you are just wanting to modify the current one, that's different.

Maybe dump the upper passenger deck, leave the docking facilities for the launch up top, and modify the rear entry to make it double as a docking bay, so it can accomodate the launch. Which would mean making a rear cargo area that is sealed off from rest of the cargo. Somewhere amidships will need to be a small cargo lift to reach the upper cargo storage area.

Or, conversely, you could make it so that the forward clam-shell cargo doors would be where the launch could come in, and put a small cargo lift in the rear area to access the upper level.
 
A new ship it is then, bigger! ... I like the idea of an internal hanger and perhaps maybe a passenger/freight version then a just pure freight version... watch this space or another...
 
Back
Top