Damage From Nukes Detonated Within A Ship

That's a possibility. But then why not just say nuke, because that all a bomb pump laser is (just with some fancy bits)
 
Chernobyl said:
so based on the description above the drone doesn't actually detonate inside the ship? so what scenario would there be a nuke detonating aboard a ship?
Erm, somebody reversing a nuclear damper field to create a damper box effect, and training the beams on the ship's fission or fusion power plant core.

That might do it.
 
In terms of straightforward rules, I'd say use the damage for either a missile or torpedo nuke (depending on the size of nuke used) with no reduction from armour.
If the nuke is placed somewhere specific, like say on the P-Plant, the damage applies to that system directly. Otherwise roll on the internal damage table.
 
The drone does penetrate the hull before detonating, hence its spike like configuration.
A bomb pumped laser is a nuke.
The bomb laser could easily be replaced with a conventional torpedo nuke.

If you do not know what a bomb-pumped-laser is either ask questions, or please refrain from commenting.


.
 
Solomani666 said:
If you do not know what a bomb-pumped-laser is either ask questions, or please refrain from commenting.


.

Jr. I knew what one was before you were born. Either knock off the hostility or get lost.
 
DFW said:
Solomani666 said:
If you do not know what a bomb-pumped-laser is either ask questions, or please refrain from commenting.


.

Jr. I knew what one was before you were born. Either knock off the hostility or get lost.

Now who is being hostile?
You need to chill.

P.S. I'm not your junior.

.
 
Note: I do not own Traders and Gunboats, hence cannot speak from a rules perspective, only comment on the tech/physics involved.

The drone does penetrate the hull before detonating, hence its spike like configuration.

Which means the laser effect is pointless. If you're already inside the hull and setting off a nuke....would a laser head really make things much worse?

I'm not convinced the result would automatically be kablooey, especially on a big ship. The internal bulkheads would be closed in a combat environment and the major internal bracings may well be made of the same stuff (e.g. bonded superdense) as the primary armour belt.

The other problem I have is that a 20 dTon small craft ramming a big warship's armour is going to end up pancaked.

If you set off the nuke before impact with a BPL, no problem.

If you set of a contact nuke at impact, also no problem.

If you want to "drive deep into its hull", forget it.

This isn't a bunker-buster punching through rock; the armour is made of the same material as the drone and is very, very thick. I don't doubt that it can be penetrated with enough force - steel bullets can penetrate thin steel sheet, after all - but I'm really not convinced it'll happen in a way that's going to leave any device in the guts of the drone as temperamental as a nuke capable of functioning.


Personally I'd just stick with using the rules for the humungous bomb-pumped laser.
 
Back
Top