homerjsinnott
Mongoose
Have just got mine, jealous????
Will give a list when I have come down.
Will give a list when I have come down.
homerjsinnott said:Ok, just to stave off getting whacked, here are a few bits of info:
Other Cults
<snip>
Thanatar
Very interested to know how they handle Thanatars stolen magic in the game.
You should be careful about magic you buy off strange blokes in taverns. They say it's True Sword, sure, but you get home and try it out, and it turns out to be some cheap Kralorelan knock-off that actually turns your head into a dragonewt.CharlieMonster said:Very interested to know how they handle Thanatars stolen magic in the game.
It's not stolen I bought it of some bloke down the pub!
Exubae said:It is pretty cool stuff
Sorcerous orders are wicked.
Shamans and spirit magic, has a very nice feel with charms and fetishes etc.
Thanatar has been a little hampered by the way divine magic works now, but still looks like he hold his own.
The art work is also cool, though the Ungariant pic is a bit Mills and Boon'ish rather than Pentan (pg40) , still a smart pic though.
(I had grumble about something...its the only thing I could find)
True... its better than the last index though...homerjsinnott said:The appalling index?
Exubae said:True... its better than the last index though...homerjsinnott said:The appalling index?
I'm sure I worked with the Carmanian Mage... he looks damn familiar.
One big question whta has happened to the Thieves and Trickster Cults?
I thought they'ld make their presence noted in cults2? is there going to a cults3?
Exubae said:True... its better than the last index though...homerjsinnott said:The appalling index?
I'm sure I worked with the Carmanian Mage... he looks damn familiar.
One big question whta has happened to the Thieves and Trickster Cults?
I thought they'ld make their presence noted in cults2? is there going to a cults3?
Unforutuately, many of the generic cult types were understandably cut due to space and coolness factors.
CharlieMonster said:Unforutuately, many of the generic cult types were understandably cut due to space and coolness factors.
They were too cool for the book?!?
Nope, Lanbril/the Thief God is abscent, shame... hopefully we will we be seeing a Cults 2.5 on Drive thru?Voriof said:I belive the Thieves are in CoG2 as a mixed cult
Agreed- and its a damn pain to have players playing Tricksters (badly) so not to bothered about their ommision (other than for completeness)- City Cults would have been useful though, as would a list of entities/spirits associated to Divine Cults.Voriof said:Trickster IS complex and doesn't fit anything well
Exubae said:Nope, Lanbril/the Thief God is abscent, shame... hopefully we will we be seeing a Cults 2.5 on Drive thru?Voriof said:I belive the Thieves are in CoG2 as a mixed cult
Agreed- and its a damn pain to have players playing Tricksters (badly) so not to bothered about their ommision (other than for completeness)- City Cults would have been useful though, as would a list of entities/spirits associated to Divine Cults.Voriof said:Trickster IS complex and doesn't fit anything well
voriof said:Dear god, yes. I hate folks who play their Tricksters like "fish malks" (anyone who's played live action Vampire knows what I mean). These are usually the same folks who play Kender in D&D. Tricksters are sledom well played and seldom appreciate it when the trick goes wrong - as it must - for them.
Why is having 'thieves' as players much more acceptable than tricksters?
And why do the tricks have to go wrong?
homerjsinnott said:voriof said:Dear god, yes. I hate folks who play their Tricksters like "fish malks" (anyone who's played live action Vampire knows what I mean). These are usually the same folks who play Kender in D&D. Tricksters are sledom well played and seldom appreciate it when the trick goes wrong - as it must - for them.
I don't play VtM so could you explain?
Why is having 'thieves' as players much more acceptable than tricksters?
And why do the tricks have to go wrong?
I can see that many(half?) of them should (but not in the expected way), but all?