Email Matthew to let him know commission roll charts are missing.hdan said:Yes, but where does it say what the commission roll target number is?
Is it just 8+ now? Traditionally, it has varied by branch.
Maybe I'm being dense. I apologize if that's the case.
hdan said:Yes, but where does it say what the commission roll target number is?
Is it just 8+ now? Traditionally, it has varied by branch.
Maybe I'm being dense. I apologize if that's the case.
Narl said:Does anyone have the commission rolls from an earlier playtest doc so we can use them for character creation?
ShawnDriscoll said:It's pretty much the same as 1st edition. Not much was changed for survival/advancement either.
I think the details of this task should be added to the other commission task roll rules in the Commission section on page 17 and not just put on the career pages.DickNervous said:I used the old ones since it looks like the Survival and Advancement rolls are the same, which is SOC 8+ for all branches.
ShawnDriscoll said:Ok. I'm seeing what happened here. In 1st edition, SOC 8+ was rolled for in each term to see if a commission happens or not. The SOC 8+ is on the page of each military career (in the printing I have of it).
In 2nd edition, the commission roll is not listed on the pages. But is mentioned as SOC 9+ on page 9. Still it's unclear if SOC 9+ is the roll for a commission or if it is still SOC 8+. Or if it is an automatic one-time commissioned deal if one's SOC happens to be is 9+.
For now, just use best practice.
Maybe I am dense, but wasn't it already said that if a check roll is not given assume 8+? Or is there a reason we are unsure that applies here? Sorry if I missed something in the conversation.mlooney said:What isn't give is what the commission roll is, which I believe the consensuses. is it SOC 8+.
Yes, average (8+) is assumed. But for Mongoose Traveller, the tradition has been to say which Characteristic Modifier to use with such a roll. Rarely is a "Just roll 8+ now" ever asked. Rolls have to mean something.-Daniel- said:Maybe I am dense, but wasn't it already said that if a check roll is not given assume 8+? Or is there a reason we are unsure that applies here? Sorry if I missed something in the conversation.mlooney said:What isn't give is what the commission roll is, which I believe the consensuses. is it SOC 8+.
Ah I see what you mean. They need to say at least "Make a SOC check" for me to assume the 8+. Got it.ShawnDriscoll said:Yes, average (8+) is assumed. But for Mongoose Traveller, the tradition has been to say which Characteristic Modifier to use with such a roll. Rarely is a "Just roll 8+ now" ever asked. Rolls have to mean something.
I think you invented a new term "make a SOC check." Don't have to say average. Don't have to say roll 8+. I've heard it used. I've probably said it to players. But I haven't seen it in print all that much. "Make an INT check." Looks much better than "Make an INT 8+ check."-Daniel- said:Ah I see what you mean. They need to say at least "Make a SOC check" for me to assume the 8+. Got it.ShawnDriscoll said:Yes, average (8+) is assumed. But for Mongoose Traveller, the tradition has been to say which Characteristic Modifier to use with such a roll. Rarely is a "Just roll 8+ now" ever asked. Rolls have to mean something.