Cannot wrap my head around wafer jacks.

What was the purpose of the rule? Wafer Jacks are OP and the writer wanted to nerf them so you can't just keep switching out skills? Oh no! I take out one jack and stick in another. Easy. So, now what is the purpose of the rule?
Yes?

Total storage capacity of physical data wafers is indicated by the wafer jack’s total Bandwidth. Swapping out software is done with physical media and not possible in the heat of the moment.
Nerfed to a limited number of skills possible in a scene.
 
Yes?


Nerfed to a limited number of skills possible in a scene.
Isn't a USB considered "physical media"? This seems to be a holdover from 70s tech. Swapping out physical media currently is easy and can be done even while skydiving, unless the helmet gets in the way. lol

Edit - In this case, I want to be a robot PC. All of the skills, all of the time. lol
 
RAW: "The main benefit of the jack is that it is MUCH smaller and more discrete than a hand computer ..." CRB p107
Discuss:
A "modest" computer is one that processes symbols and alphabets at comparatively high speed. It's architecture typically has a memory and a processor.
A Wafer Jack is a cybernetic device that is limited in size by the space available in skull. It processes neural networks much like the brain processes neurons. Such a neural network architecture has numerically weighted neurons and an interconnection network. It doesn't have "digital memory" because everything is stored on neurons.

Switching out a Wafer Jack s/w requires surgery.
What was the purpose of the rule? Wafer Jacks are OP and the writer wanted to nerf them so you can't just keep switching out skills? Oh no! I take out one jack and stick in another. Easy. So, now what is the purpose of the rule?
 
Switching out a Wafer Jack s/w requires surgery.
No, a wafer jack is a jack for wafers, standard data storage devices (something like a high tech SD card).
CSC, p61:
Skärmavbild 2025-04-17 kl. 14.18.png

CSC, p68:
DATA WAFER
The standard information storage in many universes is the data wafer, a rectangle of hardened plastic the size of a credit card. The interface is standardised but the internal workings vary. A TL10 data wafer is memory diamond, with information encoded in carbon atoms; advanced wafers use more exotic means of data storage. At TL8 a data wafer can store and transfer Bandwidth/0 computer programs; at TL10 it can hold Bandwidth/1 programs.
 
Because the computer rules need to be completely re-written... a computer should have three characteristics - processing, storage, bandwidth.
...
Yes, and it should be kept on a very abstract level. Trying to figure out the capabilities of computers hundreds or thousands years into the future is doomed to fail.

(That goes for most technology predictions, but when it comes to computers the rules will be outdated within a year or two.)
 
Given the limitations of the Wafer Jack, I would not be averse to Intelligence Interface being a special interface that allows you to use Expert packages without the usual -1 penalty (Intellect+ if you will). This would give them some advantage over Neural Comms interfaced to discrete computers (which are my goto).
 
I appreciate the responses. I cannot decided if I am beginning to understand how to use them or I am even more confused.:LOL: Maybe I should have asked to explain it like I am 5 or like I am in my 80s and don't really understand computers.:ROFLMAO:

Possible example.
My Engineer PC with Wafer Jack TL12, has M Drive 1. So if she has a wafer that has the expert M-drive 3 installed she cannot use it because it uses too much bandwidth, but if she has a wafer, expert M-drive 2 she can and it gives her a +1 to any M-drive checks? Is this mostly correct
Frankly she can have Expert/1 M-Drive and still get +1 to her M-Drive INT or EDU based skill checks (using 1 of her 4 available bandwidth). Using higher level Expert package only increases the maximum difficulty of task the Expert system can assist with (It will only provide +1). Expert/1 can only help with difficulty 10 or lower task.
 
A Computer/0 at TL15 weighs less than 20 grams and has unlimited storage. I agree, the rules need rewritten for computers. I also agree that it should be kept vague for the reasons listed above by @Varulv
 
I always wondered why Traveller decided computers improve at every TL after 5.

I think the whole computer paradigm should be revisited.

mechanical electronic photonic organic

An electronic based computer is only good for so many TLs etc.

CT Robots began exploring linear, parallel , and then synaptic processors, perhaps that distinction could come back?
 
I always wondered why Traveller decided computers improve at every TL after 5.

I think the whole computer paradigm should be revisited.

mechanical electronic photonic organic

An electronic based computer is only good for so many TLs etc.

CT Robots began exploring linear, parallel , and then synaptic processors, perhaps that distinction could come back?
Moore's law. Though to be honest progress isn't nearly fast enough. In fairness the progress is probably slowed by bloatware. Processors have moved on significantly but software has not kept pace as we just use the extra capacity for useless crap and lazy design.

If you try to tie it to pseudo-science you have to invent it and make it consistent. Handwavium is universally valent.
 
Last edited:
They still improved at every TL, and we were told how their capabilities changed in terms of tonnage, CPU, storage, and relative bonus to activity.
Over time some oddities crept in - a model 1 computer being laptop size at a certain TL rather than 1 displacement ton.

I find the MgT bandwidth model to be... lacking.
 
They still improved at every TL, and we were told how their capabilities changed in terms of tonnage, CPU, storage, and relative bonus to activity.
Sure, why wouldn't they?


Over time some oddities crept in - a model 1 computer being laptop size at a certain TL rather than 1 displacement ton.
Sure, at a much higher TL. Why not?


I find the MgT bandwidth model to be... lacking.
It's the same as CT?
CT m/1 = MgT m/5,
CT m/2 = MgT m10, etc.

MgT is a little bit more detailed with retrotech and smaller computers.
 
Going by the short story Names there is a stigma to being wafer jacked, but they are too useful not to have.

In T5 there is a wafer "headset" that provides the same interface with wafers but without the needs to be hardwired yourself.

As to wireless, the wafer jack would need a transmitter/receiver.

And very soon you are in Infinity/Altered Carbon territory.

Note that the new Singularity campaign will include digitising PCs and downloading them into host bodies - clones, synthetics, androids, robots, battle dress...

so it looks like the Rubicon has been jetskied across...
 
The things that make up computers are software and hardware.

Software tells it how to behave, and hardware the physical limitations of it's performance.

Bandwidth would be how much can be done in a specific time window, which should be some combination of what can kept compartmentalized, compromised by what needs to move through various bottlenecks.

At this point, storage might be what can be kept in random access memory, not what's on the hard drives.

You could complicate it by commandeering unused space in the hard drive for random access memory overflow, and just using parts of the programme that actually are relevant to the tasks being performed.

Or, in Traveller, everything is on one chip.

That's why, it takes up no discernible volume.
 
Someone posted this a while back. Thought it might help.

 
Back
Top