A few more World At War questions...

GypsyComet

Emperor Mongoose
Played another test game tonight. We are slowly finding all appropriate rules, and occasionally questions...

Does a multi-weapon vehicle with Multishot/X need to drop dice to attack more than one target unit?

Does the use of a Co-Axial MG count as "firing" a weapon for the purposes of Multishot if it is adding the +1 to the other weapon? Example: a three weapon tank (main gun, co-axial MG, and Hull MG) with Multishot/2 wants to fire the main gun with the co-axial modifier. Can it also fire the hull mount on the same Shoot Action?

Does the un-stabilized shooting penalty apply to shoot-and-scoot (ie. Fire THEN move)?

Would it be reasonable to allow Slow to have a reaction Shoot option if the gun crew/vehicle had finished the previous turn with a Ready action?

Are Mid-War Germans (as opposed to Late, Early-Early, and Late-Early) in the plan at some point? Hungarians and Romanians?
 
GypsyComet said:
Does a multi-weapon vehicle with Multishot/X need to drop dice to attack more than one target unit?
Presuming that you are talking about the Multifire Trait: Yes.
GypsyComet said:
Does the use of a Co-Axial MG count as "firing" a weapon for the purposes of Multishot if it is adding the +1 to the other weapon? Example: a three weapon tank (main gun, co-axial MG, and Hull MG) with Multishot/2 wants to fire the main gun with the co-axial modifier. Can it also fire the hull mount on the same Shoot Action?
Yes and no it can't fire the hull mount weapon with the same Shoot Action in your example.
GypsyComet said:
Does the un-stabilized shooting penalty apply to shoot-and-scoot (ie. Fire THEN move)?
Officially yes, however you may want to check the free A.D.Publishing "Add-On".

GypsyComet said:
Would it be reasonable to allow Slow to have a reaction Shoot option if the gun crew/vehicle had finished the previous turn with a Ready action?
Not within the official rules, but it is our game, create a houserule.
 
Multifire, right. Typing at 2AM means all the possible variations of a term are 'good enough'. urgh.


I'm thinking we're still a bit fuzzy on the implications of cover, obscurement, etc on fire zones, but I'll go read it again while awake...
 
Back
Top