:lol:Burger said:No boom Today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.
mikelosaurus said:Sien_Creis said:What i would like to know is; whats happening to the license under which Mongoose produced the B5 stuff? Are they gonna hang onto it or allow other smaller companies to produce them? Its easy to see them wanting to hold onto it, but eventually people will want to expand, start even replace some of their models. What happens then? Eventually even the most loyal fan will move on to something else. If anything its, in their interest to allow another company to produce the models and allow more gamers to start the game.
Perhaps a more pertinent question is: What will happen to the moulds? If the moulds are destroyed then it won't be possible to cast any new minis without going through the whole sculpting/moulding process all over again. On the other hand, if the moulds are placed in storage, then it's feasible that, even if Mongoose aren't interested themselves, somebody else could feasibly cut a deal on the IP and the license to start churning them out again, even if its in smaller numbers...
silashand said:The FRPgames website still has all the pics (www.frpgames.com) since they still sell the line until they run out.
Cheers, Gary
It's an ok set of rules. Nothing to lose sleep over but for a "non universe" set of rules, it works.
DM said:It's an ok set of rules. Nothing to lose sleep over but for a "non universe" set of rules, it works.
It has however managed to remain incredibly popular around the world and has spawned a number of official and unofficial "universe" variants.
As they say in some quarters, "Full Thrust endures"![]()
Stonehorse said:Mongoose have merged all their Babylon 5 products into one place on their site. A move which makes sence.
Stonehorse said:As for the forum, I can't see whay they don't merge it with the VAC forum, from what I understand the 2 games use the same rules.
Shadow Queen said:I know I said it before but why not look into a UK foundery as well, so they dont have to import the minis and pay a silly import tax.
JayRaider said:Then why not just do monthly contracts with the foundry?
It is sufficient to say that this is a good and playable set of rules.
DM said:It is sufficient to say that this is a good and playable set of rules.
As is ACTA
I would, however, respectfully suggest as a wargamer of several decades experience (and with experience of many, many sets of rules across many genres, historical, SF and F, some excellent, some truly awful), that FT falls well within the upper bound.