127th Angry Angels
Mongoose
Might be a stupid question (not being an arms expert) but 30.cals are not in the armory section for US infantry. I thought they were very prominent in WW2. Is it a deliberate omission?
Ben2 said:Isn't it the same MG as the hull MG on the Sherman and Cromwell though? Or did the infantry model have a greater muzzle velocity to justify the +1 on the damage?
Ben2 said:I think everyone with a choice would take the .50 cal, and this is why it has been left out of the book.
Mac said:Ben2 said:I think everyone with a choice would take the .50 cal, and this is why it has been left out of the book.
Fine, but historically a US Infantry Company's Weapons Platoon had 2xM1919 LMGs and 3x60mm Mortars (another weapon missing entirely). The battalion Heavy Machine Gun platoons were equipped with M1917 HMGs. No M2's there at all in the TO&E.
Additionally, the stats for the BAR look out of line with it's historical performance. It seems that the Bren Gun, arguably the best LMG in Allied service, is inferior to the BAR.
Just a few things to consider when you are working on errata.
Laffe said:I feel that the Bar is seriously overrated in the list; it's better than the MG42 and the Bren, at least when carried, which seems wrong.
And the .30 is still in the list; US combat engineers can switch their flamethrower for a .30, but it's stats aren't anywhere. Another thing for when the errata is released.
DM said:Top magazine is FAR easier to reload when firing prone (he says from personal experience), so I wouldn't say the BAR wins on that point![]()
Certainly, but I'm talking about on the move, not prone.
Laffe said:snip...
And the .30 is still in the list; US combat engineers can switch their flamethrower for a .30, but it's stats aren't anywhere. Another thing for when the errata is released.
Rabidchild said:I love the BAR just as it is, so keeping my bias in mind my argument for the BAR being better on the move is this: BAR = 20lbs (loaded), MG42 = 25lbs, bren gun = 22lbs and a magazine on the top. From this list, the BAR is the lightest and has the same weight distribution of a conventional rifle (ie no side drum/belt feed or top magazine). Seems like it would be the easiest to raise to your shoulder, aim and fire while pausing. So, stats seem fine to me!
Agis said:Laffe said:snip...
And the .30 is still in the list; US combat engineers can switch their flamethrower for a .30, but it's stats aren't anywhere. Another thing for when the errata is released.
I have commited my input to the Players guide last week to Matt, the .30 cal issue is covered! Stay tuned...
wkehrman said:This last statement rings hollow to me as it is typical for us to have to "stay tuned" for several weeks if not months for a correction. Having said that, the "MG" on almost any US vehicle would be the M1919 Air cooled LMG. Could the Vickers double for the M1917?
Laffe said:Now, that being said, before the Forum vanished just recently, you had posted some stats (and points) for the .30-cal. I would be very glad if you could repost them Agis, since I intend to use them instead of .50's in my games as a house rule. Please? Pretty please with sugar on top?
Laffe said:I think we all have to realise that Agis is the author of the game, caught between a rock (the players) and a hard place (Mongoose Publishing).