2nd Ed its great :D : however in an ideal world.......

The lose/loose thing, whilst vaguely annoying, doesn't bother me massively. I put that down to the fact that I spent a few years living in an area where the locals would say "I won you!" instead of "I beat you!" whenever they won a game. Now that's annoying :evil:
 
neko said:
I put that down to the fact that I spent a few years living in an area where the locals would say "I won you!" instead of "I beat you!" whenever they won a game. Now that's annoying :evil:

In Somerset or somewhere else?

That saying, "I won you", is rife in Ireland. Along with the use of "messages" as a synonym for "groceries".
 
In an attempt to get back on track, I think that the Octurion is a good ship. A previous post said that the Octurion needs to be supported in , battle and it can carve through a fleet. For comparison, one wouldn't send a Poseidon into battle on it's own. Sure, it carries 24 flights of a damn good fighter that can give an opposing admiral a really, really bad day but, get rid of the fighters and the Poseidon becomes a big juicy target for the big guns. That's why the canny admiral has escorting ships (note, I said escorting, not escorts. Escorting ships could refer to two Apollo Bombardment cruisers, etc.)
 
emperorpenguin said:
neko said:
I put that down to the fact that I spent a few years living in an area where the locals would say "I won you!" instead of "I beat you!" whenever they won a game. Now that's annoying :evil:

In Somerset or somewhere else?

That saying, "I won you", is rife in Ireland. Along with the use of "messages" as a synonym for "groceries".
It was up in Rochdale (Lancashire). Down here I only have to contend with comboin 'arvesters instead :lol:
 
wyrdmaster said:
In an attempt to get back on track, I think that the Octurion is a good ship. A previous post said that the Octurion needs to be supported in , battle and it can carve through a fleet. For comparison, one wouldn't send a Poseidon into battle on it's own. Sure, it carries 24 flights of a damn good fighter that can give an opposing admiral a really, really bad day but, get rid of the fighters and the Poseidon becomes a big juicy target for the big guns. That's why the canny admiral has escorting ships (note, I said escorting, not escorts. Escorting ships could refer to two Apollo Bombardment cruisers, etc.)

Trouble with the Octurion is that it punches below its weight. It's pretty tough for its level and has a reasonable, if not spectacular, fighter compliment, but it struggles to kill ships of its own level. The 16 dice of ion cannons up front is nice, backed by 12 dice of matter cannons and 6 of precise beams, but it's all short range and most of it struggles to hit hull 6 targets. It's a great centre for a slow-moving Centauri battlegroup, but it won't be knocking down many war units.

Comparing it to the Poseidon is not the way to look at it, though. It's not a carrier, it's a dreadnought that lacks the capacity to do what dreadnoughts are meant to do - destroy opposing dreadnoughts. A battleship is not a support unit like a carrier, and escorting units are meant to shield them from enemy destroyers and cruisers, not do their work for them while the battleships kill the enemy light units.
 
Lord David the Denied said:
wyrdmaster said:
In an attempt to get back on track, I think that the Octurion is a good ship. A previous post said that the Octurion needs to be supported in , battle and it can carve through a fleet. For comparison, one wouldn't send a Poseidon into battle on it's own. Sure, it carries 24 flights of a damn good fighter that can give an opposing admiral a really, really bad day but, get rid of the fighters and the Poseidon becomes a big juicy target for the big guns. That's why the canny admiral has escorting ships (note, I said escorting, not escorts. Escorting ships could refer to two Apollo Bombardment cruisers, etc.)

Trouble with the Octurion is that it punches below its weight. It's pretty tough for its level and has a reasonable, if not spectacular, fighter compliment, but it struggles to kill ships of its own level. The 16 dice of ion cannons up front is nice, backed by 12 dice of matter cannons and 6 of precise beams, but it's all short range and most of it struggles to hit hull 6 targets. It's a great centre for a slow-moving Centauri battlegroup, but it won't be knocking down many war units.

Comparing it to the Poseidon is not the way to look at it, though. It's not a carrier, it's a dreadnought that lacks the capacity to do what dreadnoughts are meant to do - destroy opposing dreadnoughts. A battleship is not a support unit like a carrier, and escorting units are meant to shield them from enemy destroyers and cruisers, not do their work for them while the battleships kill the enemy light units.

I concur. The Octurian is a knife fighter with a pocket knife. It probably should have had a greater ranged weapon and a little more teeth to the secondarys. Even AP would have made it more what it should be.
 
I'd argue for the Secundus-style heavy ion cannons in every arc, or as an additional weapon in the front arc with a suitable reduction on AD to pay for it. One of the big advantages of the Octurion is the firepower it can put out in every direction, so giving it heavy ion cannons at the front and regular ones everywhere else detracts from that purpose.
 
Lord David the Denied said:
I'd argue for the Secundus-style heavy ion cannons in every arc, or as an additional weapon in the front arc with a suitable reduction on AD to pay for it. One of the big advantages of the Octurion is the firepower it can put out in every direction, so giving it heavy ion cannons at the front and regular ones everywhere else detracts from that purpose.

A beam weapon with range would be nice. But, we can make that argument for a large proportion of the Centauri fleet. I'm in the "they've pulled one too many teeth" group of thought.
 
David said:
A beam weapon with range would be nice. But, we can make that argument for a large proportion of the Centauri fleet. I'm in the "they've pulled one too many teeth" group of thought.

Agreed there...
 
I don't think that's true. I'd like to see ion cannons get nastier than they are - TL, DD is nice but like I say it struggles to hit high hull targets, and the visible effect a couple of ion cannon hits have on B5 itself doesn't suggest to me that they're only good for killing little ships. Likewise in season 5 we see Vorchans and Demos shoot up various ships with little apparent effort.

I don't want to go back to the Centauri Beam Team, but I would like to see a tweak to the Centauri's main weapon.
 
Lord David the Denied said:
I don't think that's true. I'd like to see ion cannons get nastier than they are - TL, DD is nice but like I say it struggles to hit high hull targets, and the visible effect a couple of ion cannon hits have on B5 itself doesn't suggest to me that they're only good for killing little ships. Likewise in season 5 we see Vorchans and Demos shoot up various ships with little apparent effort.

I don't want to go back to the Centauri Beam Team, but I would like to see a tweak to the Centauri's main weapon.

Agreed. The ion cannon need AP at least. As for the beam team stuff, I see no reason for the big ships to not have a decent beam weapon.
 
They don't come much bigger than the Primus, but it never uses a beam on screen. It's conceivable that the Centauri just don't use beams, but almost every other advanced race does, and we're told the Narn got laser technology from the Centauri. Although, I don't remember that being said on screen, so who knows?

Personally I don't mind not having much in the way of beams, or even going to a totally beamless Centauri fleet, the Vree do ok without beams after all. I just don't want to be relying on TL to get me the few hits I manage agaisnt high hull targets.
 
Lord David the Denied said:
They don't come much bigger than the Primus, but it never uses a beam on screen. It's conceivable that the Centauri just don't use beams, but almost every other advanced race does, and we're told the Narn got laser technology from the Centauri. Although, I don't remember that being said on screen, so who knows?

Personally I don't mind not having much in the way of beams, or even going to a totally beamless Centauri fleet, the Vree do ok without beams after all. I just don't want to be relying on TL to get me the few hits I manage agaisnt high hull targets.

If not a beam then perhaps a bank of ion torpedos? Something, with more range.....
 
Back
Top