Colin said:I've been reluctant to wade in on this. There have been some good ideas, many of which I disagree with.
There's only a couple of changes I would've made. An independent Quebec would be one of them. Indepedent, but allied with a Canada that accepts them rather than a France that disdains them as "provincial".
I could see Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia becoming a country, but there some significant differences, with BC/Oregon seeming to have more in common then with Washington.
I appreciate your thoughts and insights, BTW.
I found N America the most perplexing Core region (followed by Africa and whatever the heck is happening in the Urals?!?) because territories and divisions today are clearly not those described of the 24th Century. Yet, we have an American Arm. A puzzle.
Being a far wanderer of the area known as Cascadia, I can assure you Washington and Oregon get along fine and share a particular ethos (and odd crotchetiness) with Lower BC and Northern Cali down to SFrisco, the southern terminus of the Kingdom of Rain. The division is stranger west to east than north to south. Its capital I would probably assign to Vancouver, BC, since that is the most culturally diverse and metropolitan city (yes, even a tad more than SF). Or maybe—taking a riff from Highlander—Seacouver. Plus it is regionally central.
Southern Alaska would probably come along, too, if asked very politely and left alone thereafter.
I tend to think RTT is on to something with his Pacifica. It is larger in scale and scope; and "Cascadia" has acquired some treehugger connotations offputting to the hinterlands. So if you wanted to declare something canonically, I would bless it.
On the colonies, on the other hand, people tend to have a strong libertarian streak, even as they ignore the subsidies and support that allowed them to settle an alien planet. People in the colonies aren't looking for strong government, but more for government to leave them alone. This is true even in the Manchurian and Incan colonies, or at least the hope of less government control.
Again, thanks for your insights. Libertarian really is beyond left and right, being fixed to neither. Makes sense to me.