Would you switch to RuneQuest?

[SnowDog]

Yes, absolutely I would get it.

Granted, it gives a bit different feel for the game than d20 or SW. Probably a bit more gritty but I'm cool with it.

 

[Garet]

no, RQ is just not appealing

 

[rabindranath72]

It amazes me to see that some people would bypass a good Conan supplement if it's not written from their favourite system.

I'm like that. I love Traveller, but I'm a Classic Traveller player. So, I don't buy GURPS and I don't buy Mongoose Traveller.

I'd be the same with Conan. I play the Conan 2E rules. A supplement for, say, the Basic Roleplaying system is no use to me*.





*Unless I find it for rock, bottom, near-nothin' prices.

I learned this lesson back with TNE came out for Traveller. I bought a bunch of that crap and never opened the TNE stuff I bought. The stuff I could us in the CT game, though, I use and continue to use all the time.

Chances are, that a RQ Conan supplement would be more usable and generic than a d20 Conan supplement, considering that when they included stat blocks, the d20 Conan books tended to fill huge parts of the product. I am still banging my head against the wall for having bought the Conan Compendium...more than 10 pages with stat blocks of GUARDS! :roll: And Tito's Trading Post, pages upon pages of merchant stats.