Just look here:barnest2 said:Is this supplement for WOD? If so... does it cover British military at all? Is it generalised?
Just the core book. It works with any of the other game lines and any of the core WoD supplements from Antagonists up to Book of The Dead, and by Crikey it can fit in with Hunter: the Vigil like fingers in a glove - but you really only need Dogs and the WoD core rulebook.barnest2 said:Cooo....
What book would I need to use it. I've played in a couple of WOD games, and I wonder whether its a supplement for a specific one?
It looks... interesting
God I need some money![]()
Alex, you don't need to give me a mea culpa. It's a damm fine book and I understand the constraints of 'X pages' and such. What you weren't able to cover due to space, got absolutely butchered in SpecOps. I was heavily disappointed with SpecOps while I was still happy with DoW.alex_greene said:It's one little mea culpa I've had to carry for a long time. Believe me.![]()
Do it! Why not a bit of cross promotion, especially after the "WW gets Traveller" joke?alex_greene said:This is going to sound weird, but I've had more interest in this book expressed on this board than I have had on the White Wolf fora.
Maybe I ought to write some more Traveller stuff and talk about it there.![]()
I have no problem with it, especially since the Third Edition has dealt withbarnest2 said:What went wrong with SpecOps?
As a retired member of the USAF, I was appalled at not the lack of information but the misinformation on how the USAF operates, its officer and enlisted corp etc. I can't judge anything about services for another country nor the accuracy of anything other than the USAF.barnest2 said:What went wrong with SpecOps?
Hardly possible for him, since he is permabanned from this forum. YouNEUniverse2 said:I leave the above unspellchecked to allow you to make all the spelling fLAMES you want Doktorevil.
Yep, but there, not here, where EDG cannot react. Besides, I really dislikecaptainjack23 said:Still, if EDG linked to his post from SFRPG, seems fair he should respond.
rust said:Yep, but there, not here, where EDG cannot react. Besides, I really dislikecaptainjack23 said:Still, if EDG linked to his post from SFRPG, seems fair he should respond.
anonymous personal attacks ...
You are still on the member list of SFRPG, so either the software has acaptainjack23 said:I'd check, but he banned me on SFRPG for a post he didn't like that I made on COTI.
rust said:You are still on the member list of SFRPG, so either the software has acaptainjack23 said:I'd check, but he banned me on SFRPG for a post he didn't like that I made on COTI.
problem or you were unbanned ?
rust said:You are still on the member list of SFRPG, so either the software has a problem or you were unbanned ?
rust said:You are still on the member list of SFRPG, so either the software has acaptainjack23 said:I'd check, but he banned me on SFRPG for a post he didn't like that I made on COTI.
problem or you were unbanned ?
AndrewW said:rust said:You are still on the member list of SFRPG, so either the software has a problem or you were unbanned ?
Could be someone was banned without the account being removed, it could still be there just can't access it.
I am very sorry to hear this, it would nice to have you back.captainjack23 said:Nah. I'm still banned.
He does not post often, and usually under the Spica Publishing label.Is gruffty even here any more ?
rust said:I am very sorry to hear this, it would nice to have you back.captainjack23 said:Nah. I'm still banned.![]()