We are broken! Lets re-unite

[captainsmirk]

Well they were definately better than the British or American ones...

Soviet? More debatable.

Plus that advantage only really came in later in the war. During the Battle for France, most French tanks were superior to the German ones (just used badly).

Nick

 

[Nomad]

Well they were definately better than the British or American ones...

Soviet? More debatable.

Plus that advantage only really came in later in the war. During the Battle for France, most French tanks were superior to the German ones (just used badly).

Nick

WTF? :shock:

 

[captainsmirk]

To what are you refering to... :?

Nick

 

[Nomad]

To what are you refering to

What I was doing was taking the p*** (in a friendly way) out of Tank, as in EA player from Borden. As were the previous posts on this thread.

"Define better Tanks" was a quote from himself on another thread, a pune or play on words.

Where did you get the idea we were talking about WW2 German armour?

 

[Tank]

Yes continue to mock me you fools!!!!

I will beat you, I will!!! ANd my tatse in spaceships is just fine thank you very much!!! Altho my paintjobs could do with some work :lol: ANd if everybody just leaves my beloved Saggi alone I will have enough big guns :lol:

:lol: :lol:

 

[captainsmirk]

What I was doing was taking the p*** (in a friendly way) out of Tank, as in EA player from Borden. As were the previous posts on this thread.

"Define better Tanks" was a quote from himself on another thread, a pune or play on words.

Where did you get the idea we were talking about WW2 German armour?

Oh sorry I think I was thinking about a different thread, probably in fact on a different forum...

That'll teach me to post without reading the previous page first...

Nick

 

[Tank]

And I might even have been commenting on defining why WW2 german tanks were better.

 

[Wing Commander]

We can help build a better Tank, I think I have a book on Cybernetics kicking around the store somewhere....

 

[Nomad]

What I was doing was taking the p*** (in a friendly way) out of Tank, as in EA player from Borden. As were the previous posts on this thread.

"Define better Tanks" was a quote from himself on another thread, a pune or play on words.

Where did you get the idea we were talking about WW2 German armour?

Oh sorry I think I was thinking about a different thread, probably in fact on a different forum...

That'll teach me to post without reading the previous page first...

Nick

LoL! No worries, mate.

 

[Reaverman]

We can help build a better Tank, I think I have a book on Cybernetics kicking around the store somewhere....

Make sure you include a processor, that tells him how good his dice rolls are and then he cant moan. In fact a 'Moaning' inhibitor would also be good too

 

[Nomad]

Slightly more serious point.

One thing that does nark me is people posting on this forum who whinge on incessantly about one particular rule or ship.

If you don't like something, then say so. Fine.

If someone posts back disagreeing with you, then argue your case. Fine.

But if you have no argument to make, and cannot say'because', as in 'because I playtested it against so-and-so', (who, incidentally is required to be a real, live, concious player, not your pet cat, your imaginary friend or Mrs Palm and her five lovely daughters), 'and it fell over/caught fire/blew up' - delete as appropriate -

Then for pity's sake let it go!

And don't just waste electrons repeating that 'you don't like it' over and over. If you've explained it and they don't agree...it's because they think you're *wrong*.

The Government of the Federal Republic of Slobovia thanks you for taking the time to read this message.

 

[H]

you know... i think the saggi might be overpowered. . .

 

[Locutus9956]

yes the saggitarius is very broken and I hate it, have I mentioned this yet?

 

[Nomad]

I could not agree with you more. Fortunately, Matt has just posted that he's dropping it to Patrol PL in the next S&P, and adding a few more missiles.

See? Reasoned argument works.

 

[thePirv]

I could not agree with you more. Fortunately, Matt has just posted that he's dropping it to Patrol PL in the next S&P, and adding a few more missiles.

See? Reasoned argument works.

This does not go far enough. It should also lose the Slow Loading so that all the missiles may be fired every turn, or is that maybe going just a wee bit too far?

 

[H]

I dunno, I'd kind of like to give it stealth 5+

 

[Burger]

There needs to be a Sag-only missile variant, too, the Beam Missile: Beam, Precise, Quadruple Damage, Super Duper AP.

 

[Locutus9956]

No thats still not enough, It should gain more missiles, drop to patrol, lose slow loading, switch all its batteries to turret arc and have the anti stealth thing the Nemesis has

Oh and a special rule letting it fire heavy missiles at 30"

Think that should just about do it

Oh wait, no, give it adaptive armour and stealth too, there :twisted:

 

[Locutus9956]

There needs to be a Sag-only missile variant, too, the Beam Missile: Beam, Precise, Quadruple Damage, Super Duper AP.

you forgot the e-mine trait too

 

[thePirv]

There needs to be a Sag-only missile variant, too, the Beam Missile: Beam, Precise, Quadruple Damage, Super Duper AP.

No, Uber AP (hits on a 2+ ), Hyper Precise (crits on a 2+), Beam, Quadruple damage, Anti-fighter.
And the Sag should also get an equivalent of the HEL-Track system :twisted:

you forgot the e-mine trait too

And that too.