Wave 3 Stats

[Paladin]

Just noticed an error in the Tunguska. Has a base armor of 5, but the Armored section says it has a 5+ to the sides and rear due to weaker armor. Should it's base be 4+?

 

[cordas]

Just noticed an error in the Tunguska. Has a base armor of 5, but the Armored section says it has a 5+ to the sides and rear due to weaker armor. Should it's base be 4+?

Maybe its just MGP trying to be consistant, and as other armoured rules state the value of side and rear..... :?:

 

[Mr Evil]

Oh my God. Please, not a punctuation post. Evil will not survive.

Did you know there is a shortage of punctuation in the world? Mongoose are helping by freeing up exclaimation marks, they used 21 (at least) in a mere 4 pages of the BF:EVO rules.

im don my bit ar u doin yurs

 

[byram]

This is 2015 not 2007 :wink: by the time it gets comissioned in 2014 it will have a different name 8)

and they shall call it "susan"

Hmmm I thought they where calling it delayed till 2217......

technically your both wrong, they call it "wanker killer mk4"

 

[The Old Soldier]

Just noticed an error in the Tunguska. Has a base armor of 5, but the Armored section says it has a 5+ to the sides and rear due to weaker armor. Should it's base be 4+?

Maybe its just MGP trying to be consistant, and as other armoured rules state the value of side and rear..... :?:

No, Paladin DID catch a error. It does happen you know... :lol:

 

[cordas]

No, Paladin DID catch a error. It does happen you know... :lol:

So what is the correct value then? 2,3,4?