Wave 2 tomorrow?
- Thread starter tiepilot1138
- Start date
My stick wrapped in foam was a mace with the apt name of Nadsmasher.......my last paint ball game my water bottle slid along its belt and ended up coving my tender bits, life has a funny way of keeping you safe, the poor bottle got plasterd when i slid into an enemy bunker i thought was safe !!! we got the flag just on my bravado and flashy moves 
and the bottle will always have that as a designated home now for games.
and the bottle will always have that as a designated home now for games.Xorrandor said:
That's because the rules sucked and they tried to sell players in random draw packages. It didn't appeal to wargamers because the rules are illogical and too simplistic with no real strategy to the game. And it didn't appeal to sports collectors because they couldn't specifically buy/collect their favorite team without dropping several hundred dollars on random packs.
lastbesthope
Mongoose
Hiromoon said:
Fair enough.
Mr Evil said:
So someone who plays by the rules is a rules lawyer, yet you advocate fielding an incomplete model to garner advantage as acceptable behaviour?
Interesting.
What's next, a sawn off Challenger 2?
LBH
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Just got my Command section and Warrior
One complaint, liked the nifty stickers under the figures but there is none under the vehicle to tell me what it is
:lol:
Really pleased with the Warrior, has a floppy, bent gun but aside from that is great
Also saw the others (apart from the PLA APC) up close, the Shadows are a bit "meh" but the Technicals and Fedayeen! :shock: Absolutely gorgeous!
oh one more pedantic point, the Warrior's card says "Warrior APC". It's not, it's an IFV :wink:
One complaint, liked the nifty stickers under the figures but there is none under the vehicle to tell me what it is
:lol: Really pleased with the Warrior, has a floppy, bent gun
but aside from that is great Also saw the others (apart from the PLA APC) up close, the Shadows are a bit "meh" but the Technicals and Fedayeen! :shock:
Absolutely gorgeous!oh one more pedantic point, the Warrior's card says "Warrior APC". It's not, it's an IFV :wink:
Armchair_Marine
Mongoose
emperorpenguin said:Just got my Command section and Warrior
One complaint, liked the nifty stickers under the figures but there is none under the vehicle to tell me what it is
Really pleased with the Warrior, has a floppy, bent gun
Also saw the others (apart from the PLA APC) up close, the Shadows are a bit "meh" but the Technicals and Fedayeen! :shock:
oh one more pedantic point, the Warrior's card says "Warrior APC". It's not, it's an IFV :wink:
APC/IFV they both carry troops.
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
APCs tend not to be armed though, IFVs are equipped to fight alonside the troops
contrast the M113 with the Bradley
contrast the M113 with the Bradley
cordas said:
It'd probably look like this:
:lol:
Don't think of it as "incomplete" LBH so much as "that's how it came in the box", remember these are prefabricated models. We're not meant to do any assembly at all. :wink:
As a house rule we don't actually play if you can see any part of the model (when it extends to gun barrels and aerials on tanks) to avoid that sort of debate.
Lorcan Nagle
Mongoose
emperorpenguin said:Really pleased with the Warrior, has a floppy, bent gun
If you mean the bar over the 40mm cannon, that's apparently a bar to protect the crew and passengers from cables strung across the road, not a gun. It's bent on the studio photos too.
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Lorcan Nagle said:emperorpenguin said:Really pleased with the Warrior, has a floppy, bent gun
If you mean the bar over the 40mm cannon, that's apparently a bar to protect the crew and passengers from cables strung across the road, not a gun. It's bent on the studio photos too.
No the gun itself, just slightly wonky and won't stay fixed in place, keeps dropping onto the hull
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Gibbs said:
I was trying to be careful with my words :wink: "floppy", "not staying up", "bent" :lol:
yup glue it'll be!
