lastbesthope
Mongoose
Shadow4ce said:Tie, the Antenna's for mine were in a plastic baggie taped to the belly of the Warrior.
Mine were in a baggie under the Warrior, but there was no tape involved.
LBH
Shadow4ce said:Tie, the Antenna's for mine were in a plastic baggie taped to the belly of the Warrior.
:shock:lastbesthope said:Shadow4ce said:Tie, the Antenna's for mine were in a plastic baggie taped to the belly of the Warrior.
Mine were in a baggie under the Warrior, but there was no tape involved.
LBH
Gibbs said::shock:lastbesthope said:Shadow4ce said:Tie, the Antenna's for mine were in a plastic baggie taped to the belly of the Warrior.
Mine were in a baggie under the Warrior, but there was no tape involved.
LBH
Ookay... a little too much information there LBH. :lol: :wink:
Thee long and short of it is Tie, they should be in there somewhere.
Hiromoon said:Just remember, when playing against LBH, it's permissible to remove the Warrior's antenna.
lastbesthope said:Hiromoon said:Just remember, when playing against LBH, it's permissible to remove the Warrior's antenna.
Exactly why was I singled out for that comment? :?:
LBH
Mr Evil said:again the bent bar on top is for trip wires, ie to stop your crew men being garooted by fishing line acros the road as your warrior hurtles down the road.
ive evan seen them attached to motor cycles
Mr Evil said:mgp realy should do some rules for other varients that we can convert from the basic stuff. give those with a degree of modling skill or passion an opertunity to have more options in a game.
Gibbs said:lastbesthope said:Hiromoon said:Just remember, when playing against LBH, it's permissible to remove the Warrior's antenna.
Exactly why was I singled out for that comment? :?:
LBH
Well there was a forum post that was made about you shooting a warrior because you could see the antennae of it. You know how people frown on rules lawyers when they do things like that. :wink:
Well, in that case it was because you asked the question LBH. :wink:lastbesthope said:The post you mention may or may not have been, or originated from, the post where I asked whether seeing the aerial alone was enough to consider that the Warrior could be seen to be shot at.
I have personally necer shot at a Warrior where only it's aerial was visible. Indeed I have only had one game where I was even pitted against Warriors. they were kind enough to hide in plain sight :lol:
LBH
Hopefully they will..... My mate really wants to put a 50cal on top of one of his shadows, and I would love to be able to put some javalins on my warrior and Challie, as I just know I am gonna need some AA......
Rick said:Hopefully they will..... My mate really wants to put a 50cal on top of one of his shadows, and I would love to be able to put some javalins on my warrior and Challie, as I just know I am gonna need some AA......
Honestly, some people! There's a perfectly serviceable mg on the turret deck of the chally, thats there for shooting at pesky aircraft!!
Gibbs said:Rick said:Hopefully they will..... My mate really wants to put a 50cal on top of one of his shadows, and I would love to be able to put some javalins on my warrior and Challie, as I just know I am gonna need some AA......
Honestly, some people! There's a perfectly serviceable mg on the turret deck of the chally, thats there for shooting at pesky aircraft!!
:lol:
Yes but there are also some aircraft that are armoured so that 7.62mm doesn't penetrate. :wink:
Gibbs said:Well, in that case it was because you asked the question LBH. :wink: