lastbesthope
Mongoose
No worries Jhary.
LBH
LBH
Jhary said:@ lasthope Sorry but when somebody Post some thing that a few here dislike then they post the TV Phrase and that so.
When some asked for a Point systhem or some clues for it = TV Show
When there is a problem with the Centaurys = TV Show
When People fell the Minbarys to strong = TV Show
And so on
Thats the reason why i ask why this persons play any game at all. Its Pure munchkindom what they do. And every other minbary Player gets the Label as Powergamer. What i don´t like.
Tredrick said:I imagine they would not respond well if, at a tournament, their opponent put a Shadow fleet on the table and said, "Canon. You lose. Thanks for the game."
lastbesthope said:Tredrick said:I imagine they would not respond well if, at a tournament, their opponent put a Shadow fleet on the table and said, "Canon. You lose. Thanks for the game."
The SHadow fleet do not always win in the show.
LBH
Actually, in the only major Shadow defeat seen, Shadow Dancing, as presented in scenario form,there is only a slight imbalance of forces as measured by ACtA points (depending on whether you make it a hige Battle level scenario or just a damn big War level). he right ships were chosen for the job, plenty of double- and Treble-Damage weapons, good all-round weaponry, good maneouvre ships, excellent fighters. Things you can attempt in any scenario at any level, if you know your own fleet. As for Sheridan? Nope, when it comes to commanding that force, you only have yourself to blame or praise for the results.Tredrick said:It requires an alliance of many races and massive numerical superiority. ANd possibly John Sheridan or another B5 regular in command. This is not possible in a 5 point Raid game.
It would certainly stop the complaints about the Minbari being too powerful. Did they win? Yes. Good, that's the right power level. The real problem isn't the 'game' element, it's the expectation level. People have a 'must win' attitude to the game. If I play, I want to beat my opponent. And that's the problem. Against Shadows, or Minbari, just survival should be the goal. Taking a single enemy ship out should be a major victory. Escaping with just a few ships intact. Adjust your expectations, and the whole thing can play far more reasonably. Shadows and Vorlons can be brought up to their proper level, laying waste to all around them, without howls of complaint about 'balance' It shouldn't BE 'balanced', it should achieve a result fitting to the source material. It doesn't have to be identical, this isn't an action replay, it could be a simulation. The more balanced and fair it becomes, the more it becomes just another generic game.It's a game. It cannot and should not perfectly mirror the TV show. In that case we need to scrap a ton of our ships. We never see a Sho'Kos cutter on the screen, do we? I can't remember seeing one.
Not in the TV show? Cut it.
Actually, a much fairer way to play would be in a campaign. EA is left with too few defenders after losing too many battles.Lawdog1700 said:I see the Battle of the Line (as a whole) to have been something like a 100 point War level Minbari fleet against a 25 point War level EA fleet. No way to win. If the sides had been equal, the results may have been different...but they weren't.
without howls of complaint about 'balance' It shouldn't BE 'balanced', it should achieve a result fitting to the source material. It doesn't have to be identical, this isn't an action replay, it could be a simulation. The more balanced and fair it becomes, the more it becomes just another generic game.
Perhaps this is the key to balancing races like the Minbari and the First Ones. Do not adjust the ship capabilities but adjust the points that are awarded for trashing their ships. OK a Sharlin can carve through a fleet of lesser ships but managing to take one down should constitute a major blow to the Minbari (their pride if not the effectiveness of their fleet).Wulf Corbett said:Against Shadows, or Minbari, just survival should be the goal. Taking a single enemy ship out should be a major victory. Escaping with just a few ships intact. Adjust your expectations, and the whole thing can play far more reasonably.
Chernobyl said:Yeah, Sheridan got as 6-6 crit on that one...of course, they changed the rules after that... :lol:
Chern
Now there, you see, you lose my interest immediately. I'm a wargamer and a roleplayer, I have no interest whatsoever in tournament play. I play ACtA as simulation, as tactical exercise, as roleplay, but never purely as game.Tredrick said:What you are missing, Wulf, is that there are two types of games: tournament and scenario.
Wulf Corbett said:I play ACtA as simulation, as tactical exercise, as roleplay, but never purely as game
Jhary said:Where in the TV Show is mention that Minbarys have an Stealth that works after the building of B5? Answer in no episode.
Lawdog1700 said:Chernobyl said:Yeah, Sheridan got as 6-6 crit on that one...of course, they changed the rules after that... :lol:
Chern
Hey I never thought of that. Boy EA sure got the short end of the stick in SFoS...first, they reduce the power of fighters....then, they take away Sheridan's victory crit.