mavikfelna
Emperor Mongoose
The ship I designed is a high-tech Commerce Raider, which is what the Harrier design is called, in a Pirate campaign. That the original Harrier is a bad Commerce Raider means that that wasn't really it's intended purpose so using Commerce Raider as the ship type is the problem. The Harrier is a diplomatic and intimidation weapon and is not better at commerce raiding than any other armed ship in its class.Yea but again the Harrier is neither a Specialized ship or a Capital ship so giving it a Core computers make no sense, especially since it’s described as “ Most capital ships, and certain specialized vessels, have multiple distributed computer networks spread throughout their decks but always include a central computer core “ again it’s a rules lawyer play which means (let ignore RP it has no purpose).
In the end the original poster has admitted that they have not read the campaign which shows in their attempt to redesign the harrier. The ship they designed doesn’t work for the campaign in any way.
As for using Core computers, with the retro tech rules they are vastly reduced in size so I have no problem putting them where they will help. Ship's computers and software is way over priced and more bandwidth costly than it should be. If you're going to be using military software, you should be using military computer hardware and the rules allow for that. I'm not going to argue about rules lawyering because I don't really care. If I wasn't trying to make an optimum build, I would do things differently. It's not any different than how my trader ships try to squeeze every bit value out of the hull space that the rules allow. If the design is supposed to be sub-optimal, I can do that too but mostly I like going for optimization for the designated task the ship is supposed to perform.




