If you mean the model posted on Planet Mongoose, it's here:
http://blog.mongoosepublishing.co.uk/index.php?blog=2&m=200708
LBH
locarno24 said:If you mean the model posted on Planet Mongoose, it's here:
http://blog.mongoosepublishing.co.uk/index.php?blog=2&m=200708
LBH
You know.....that doesn't remind me of a star destroyer so much as....I'm not quite sure what it reminds me of. But I've seen it before.
Ah. Yes. Now I place it. It's the old (old, old, old!) Gothic-class battleship from Space-Fleet, GW's forrunner to Battlefleet Gothic. Sadly the picture I have is on a piece of paper.
I understand what you mean about the 'sameness' of FT, ACTA and BFG. The thing is, that's all ultimately a factor of the size of game that's played; if a 'normal fleet' is about 5-10 capital ships (which it is in each game), a reliable one-shot-kill makes the game little more than a coin toss unless you have a 'dice-less' defence from it.
In each game the ships are 'tough' - that is they can usually sustain multiple turns of fire from a ship of equivalent size. A game with 'fragile' fleets would be interesting but would require much larger fleets to be playable over a similar length of time with similar levels of tactics.
Not that that's a bad thing. A properly epic fleet game would be impressive.
Mage said:I agree with those sentiments. I mean look at the printing fiasco. By the looks of it (from another thread) they seem to be stopping with their own production. That looks like more lay offs and probably selling the equipment.
I for one probably will not buy a new mongoose book until I see threads stop which complain about the quality of the books.
Court Jester said:Assuming there is going to be a new game now and assuming that miniatures will be coming back in 2009 and assuming that said new game will be supported with miniatures...
Quite a few assumptions here...
Nightmares about Minbari said:Starwars and BSG are both two fleet settings, which might be a bit dull for a wargame.