This may be of interest to those who like to discuss what the inside of a Traveller passenger liner might look like. This was luxurious for it's day, though the staterooms weren't. The Zepplin was nicely appointed, but couldn't hold a candle to the ocean liners in it's day and the luxury their higher paying passengers enjoyed. This is a common dichotomy that faces luxury passengers. How much luxury are they willing to give up in order to get better speed? The Concorde was considered a luxury passenger airliner, but it was comparitively cramped to 1st class on a 747. But it made the trip in just a few hours as opposed to about 13 for a 747. And the Zepplin made the trans-atlantic crossing in just a few days, as opposed to the 4-5 for an ocean liner. Clearly people are willing to pay, but even when they are paying through the nose they expect certain thing still (champagne and cocktails for both the Concorde and Zepplin). Food for thought when you are designing that J-6 passenger liner, eh?
https://www.yahoo.com/autos/amazing-color-photos-hindenburg-zeppelin-show-luxury-air-222233801.html
https://www.yahoo.com/autos/amazing-color-photos-hindenburg-zeppelin-show-luxury-air-222233801.html