You really couldn't help poking the serpent with a stick could you?
Have stick, will poke, ya know?
? Perhaps you should back up you claim by quoting an example of a real person who tops Frodo's form of self sacrifice perhaps?
Ghandi?
How about those fellows that protest violence by lightning themselves on fire? That's a pretty extreme form of self-sacrifice. It's certainly, to my view, more extreme than trapsing around half-starved for under a year and having your finger bitten off.
? Perhaps you see the destruction of native cultures and the massacre and slaughter of thousands for your own ego a moral example, eh?
Or the spread of knowledge, the building of libraries all across the known world, and a zest for life? Again - it's all about perception. Romanians view Vlad Tepes as a hero (at least some do) while contemporary altruistic-types view him as a Sadistic psychopath. Perception.
Okay- is Hitler your savior perhaps?
Even if we're going to get personal here, I think comments like this are a little uncalled for.
Actually stories tend to work more effectively than instruction for sinditioning purposes. This is why shamans use story telling to relate universal truths. The relazed atmosphere, the evocation of imahes drawn from the collective subconscious, the easy to follow chain of cause and effect 'show' rather than tell the subjects the information- whether it is valid or not. However once the act of storytelling became a secular thing the information being imparted was rather less wholesome. Now those methods to addict people to commerce and overstimulation and tends to create ADD zombies rather than enlightened people.
A little diatribe to effectively say that storytelling is a form of brainwashing? Or am I missing your point?
Stories- be they religious sermons or LotR are how such ideas are transmitted. Proof? Eliminate all memory and record of something and then to the generations past that point it does not exist. See any form of recorded history for an example. The collective consciouness of media contains the 'seed bank' of ideas that all future though stems off. Only problem- it's tainted.
Well first - separate stories from accounts. A chronicle of factual events is not a story, in the sense being discussed here. A large part of the messages from generation to generation are imparted via study of the past, not study of fictional stories.
If you're claiming that fictional stories have vastly altered or affected civilization in any meaningful way - I would have to disagree. I've yet to see people basing their lives on LotR, or running around looking for a the wise old wizard from the Kalevala (sp?).
But to be honest, I'm finding your latest entry here a bit difficult to follow - seems very garbled. And no, that isn't an insult - just pointing it out in case I'm not responding to the point you were trying to make.
Of you read Tolkien's later letters you'll see that he himself was horrified by the effects LotR had on people- people pretending to elves and hobbits [gods know what he'd think of LARPS] and other forms of fan worship which he likened to 'cultish behavior'.
Cultish behaviour like that comes and goes. And it's a very small part of the population. I would say the majority of people are pretty horrified by it. I still can't wrap my head around people dressing up as fictional characters for conventions. People are strange. But that is not a commentary on civilization and humanity itself anymore than Christianity can be said to represent the religious beliefs of the entire world.
Now there's a name that elicts respect.
Like him or not - I don't think it really matters. The analogy was apt.
If we 'all' knew that would several French and Danish embassies be smouldering ruins right now?
That would be the good guy badge at work.
What I said, I thought quite clearly, was that the concept of cosmic good and evil, in the vein, say, of a D&D Paladin's "Detect Evil" is complete fantasy and I think most sane people are aware of that. You can believe yourself to be 'Good' and that everyone else is 'evil' - and even not consider that subjective, and still recognize that it is not some cosmic supernatural fact. -- the work of fanatic religionists notwithstanding.
The masses are directed by the simple tales told to them by their reiligons and then they point the masses at the massess of their competitors. LotR fits with this cocnept as well- Free Peoples vs. Sauron's forces. So does virtually every single other work of fiction. It's just that LotR stands out in the pack. Teaching the same old lies about dualism- us vs. them.
Except that Tolkien explicitly states in the Forward of
The Lord of the Rings that he dislikes allegory - that his work is just a story. It's written right there in the front of the book. He isn't -teaching- anything, he isn't espousing any kind of belief system at all. He was telling a simple story.
Yet here you are defending that story from a critic. That conditioning can be real subtle can't it?
Put the vitriol aside for a second and try to follow the conversation. I'm defending the story -
as a story. That's all it is. And fortunately for me - I know how to separate the real world from fiction. Try it.
And instruct. All stories provide an example of behavior- whether or not that is intential.
That's true - if you are incapable of separating fantasy from the real world.
I mean are we not all here 'cause we though Howard's example of behavior- that it resonated with something inside of us? Even if it's just topless babes and common bloodlust...
I'm here because I thought Howard's stories were entertaining pieces of fiction. Nothing more, nothing less. Again - I am able to separate simple entertainment from social commentary and real life.
I don't particularly feel inclined to split a man's head in two with a sword anymore than I feel inclined to believe in moral absolutes and Dualism.
Real/pretend- got that down a long time ago.
Well it does seem that you're having difficulties separating entertaining fiction from real life.
It's all the over conditioned less than 100 IQ cases running around out there that are problematic- be they Xtian, Al-Queda freedom fighters or people who honestly should cut back on the amont of time they spend on roleplaying for simple hygine purposes. To them, the line's a lot blurrier.
Is it? I haven't met a whole lot of gamers that don't understand that real life is real life, and their game sessions are just an entertaining past-time of cooperatively telling a fictional story.
hat's why some people strap on some SEMTEX, walk into a bus station and blow themselves and 24 other people up. Why? 'Cause a work of fiction- the Koran- told them they'll get 72 houri in a pretend kingdom far away in the clouds.
Religion has nothing to do with fantasy-fiction. I don't know anyone that walked into a bus station with some SEMTEX and killed 24 people because Huma of the Lance wanted him to destroy Crynus.
The fact that some people are psychotic over their religion has no bearing on the power of -stories-. It has everything to do with the power of -religion-. If LotR were selling itself as religion, we wouldn't be disagreeing. But it's not.
You and I- we know that's just conditioning used to produce cannon fodder. They believe it. That's what makes them dangerous- and the the guys who set this system geniuses.
They believe in religion though. The stories are PART of the religion. That is a totally separate concept from a story that isn't selling itself as anything but an entertaining story. Show me a line where Tolkien states that Middle-earth is a parallel for how we should live our lives and that Eru is looking down on all of us, promising us a kingdom of love if we do his work.
I'm not saying that fiction shouldn't be written. Just maybe people should treat it like any other dangerous substance.
Wait.. then we agree? Fiction itself is just fine - however it is designed cosmologically. The fact that some people are too stupid to separate fiction from reality is immaterial to that fact.
I would agree if all that you're saying is that people should not look to fiction for real-world enlightenment.
Since you later on accuse me of being passive to my goals, what are you doing about this goal, Mr. Servant of the Dark Lord?
What 'Dark Lord' am I a servant of, exactly?
And I'm not sure what you mean by 'about this goal.' Your goals are not my goals. To be honest I really don't care that the world is a cesspool of big TVs and obescity. If there is wrong in that - then show me where the wrong is. I couldn't care less that some guy has enough cheeseburgers in his heart to choke a horse. It doesn't bother me. My interests are entirely self-serving. So long as I am happy, the world can spiral into Hell at 300 miles per hour for all I care. I don't have a noble cause - and never claimed to.
If you're asking in what activity I engage due to my own beliefs - literacy. Before I moved out of the country I was involved in an adult literacy program. It's not world-saving or world-ending, but I like the idea of people being able to read, and I'd rather involve myself in that goal than to just hope mother nature shows up and mystically turns everyone literate.
Save for the fact we see Howard's vision coming to life on CNN on a daily basis these days.
Really? Civilization has been completely obliterated and has to start over again, including the complete de-evolution of mankind? I must have missed that on CNN when I was flipping over to The Daily Show.
All empires decline, all towers fall, all cities burn in time.
But civilization itself has endured. Until it fails utterly, then Howard's perceptions are no more realistic and correct than Tolkien's. Howard's are just less idealistic and more -fatalistic-.
chuckle: So is the reading group roundtable discussion before or after the blood offering?
Blood offering? What the hell are you talking about?
:I think everyone can write their own comment about Satanists claiming to be able to seperate fantasy from reality here:
Religion-bashing from an internet-tough-girl that thinks she can cast spells? C'mon now. I really don't think you're in any place to be talkin'.
No in fact I believe in the cycle of destruction and rebirth. I want this curent stifling and corrupt culture to go down in flames and dance on the ashes- and see what new growth pops up. Maybe even shape it bit if I've got a chance.
Well grab your Anarchist's Cookbook and get to it. Otherwise you're just another narcissistic stain on society that serves no purpose.
Interesting that you believe I am passive.
I pointed it out as a possibility. I never said it was fact, and never stated that I -believe- one way or the other.
I learned black magic to destroy my enemies.
Yeah, I've noticed you bring that up on these boards 20 or 30 times. It wasn't intimidating before, it isn't intimidating now. Actually, it seems like more escapism to me. Instead of facing your problems, as you claim to be so apt at doing, you retreat to your basement with a jar of pig's blood and some multi-colour candles, muttering "Oooh, I'm gunna get
him."
Is that the "enlightened, adult" version of "I'm rubber and you're glue?"
So you're claiming "My addiction is a aquired taste. His addiction is a dangerous vice?"
No, I'm stating the fact that one man's addiction is not necessarily another's. Are -you- trying to say that because a person can become addicted to sex, or chocolate, that anyone who has sex or eats chocolate is addicted? That's ridiculous.
Note- Although I posted insults earlier in this post, in the last one Damien decides he'll be the first violate nettiquette.
I think we went past netiquette the moment you brought your anti-everything personal values into the discussion.
Does the house's rooftop spin and spit green soup?
Well obviously.
Ah, more material for the future fires. See future post on flauting of wealth here.
Wealth? I never said I was wealthy. I said I like my car. It is not an expensive car - but I like it. I am contented by it as something that I have and can look at with pride.
I'm sorry that you believe that taking pleasure in material things is wrong. Maybe you should consider giving away all of your worldly possessions and becoming an angry, vitriolic monk?
Tilll then don't bother analyzing me.
You're the one that's putting your entire persona on display - every religious and political belief, whether it has any relevance to this thread or not. The analyzing is just a natural process from seeing someone bear so much of themselves.
And you've shown that you're quite incapable of telling the difference between fiction (and its effects on society) and real-life (and real-life things like religion). I was simply pointing that out.
And just out of curiosity - what exactly am I a fanboy -of-?
Nope, just the hobby. Your anti-gaming attitude doesn't really extend to all of humanity.
Enjoy your material pleasures.
I fully intend to.
See previous post about my concerns for your untrained medical advice. I speak what I want to speak- not what other have tried to condition me to speak. Normally- when not provoked by suburbanite Satanists and such- I play nice and hold my tongue. Then people like you decide they need to gird armor and ride a white horse and come at me with a lance. Down boy. You're not the 'hero' here.
My point exactly. Actually, looking back, pretty much the second half of your post proves my point.
Pity this isn't RL. Then you could see just how much I 'cower'.
Emotionally? I'm sure I would. Physically? Who knows. I don't think you'd have much to be scared of since I have an aversion to hitting girls, especially for no reason.
I guarentee I have a lot more fights under my belt than you do.
Maybe you do. Maybe you don't. Neither one of us would have any way of knowing that about the other, would we? Weren't you the one talking about how I don't know you well enough to judge what you do in real life?
Pot, meet Kettle.
And I see you hiding behind the pretense of 'mainstream is okay 'cause I'm okay'.
Really? I'm pretty sure I never said anything of the sort. 'Course, I don't use terms like "mainstream" because I'm not some posuer 16-year-old hanging out in my parent's basement talking about how awesome I am because I'm not a 'conformist.'
Just another person's whose worth is determined by their bank account
I determine my worth by who I am and how I feel about myself as a person. I am happy with who I am, and proud of the things that I have. You seem to judge your worth based on how hateful you can be of everyone around you, who you probably hate only because they are happier than you are with themselves. That's really sad, Raven. It really is.
who claims to be a Satanist just to have a little color.
So now you don't just insult religions, but you can tell what people's actual philosophical beliefs really are, and whether they believe in whatever religion they 'claim' to ascribe to? Those are some amazing psychic powers. Did you gain them through your astounding use of candle-magic (probably spelled "magick") and voodoo dolls?
Raven, seriously - grow up. When you do, you will realize that you're simply on the same rebellious, angry road that every teenage girl has been down.