If we do it this way, make sure that hull advantages/disadvantages are not tied to the Protoype/Advanced table (as per current rules). Otherwise TL9 or less hulls are no longer possible.
If we do it this way, make sure that hull advantages/disadvantages are not tied to the Protoype/Advanced table (as per current rules). Otherwise TL9 or less hulls are no longer possible.
Yeah - I think we should make it as just an inherent advantage. Would it make sense to simply say that rather than using that table, modify cost by 20% of the cost for each step? Aka TL9 Hull is 60% cheaper. TL15 hull is 60% more expensive?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.