Have Rules, No Stats...

[Hiromoon]

If you want to be literal, sure. Just remember it's a typo, ok?

 

[Kristovich]

Hey Hiro, think you could do a template card for mercenaries? I'm working on rules for 'em you see.

 

[Hiromoon]

Sure!

 

[DM]

Hey Hiro, think you could do a template card for mercenaries? I'm working on rules for 'em you see.

Mercenaries, or private security companies?

 

[Mr Evil]

wouldnt most mercenaries be private security operatives now ?

 

[DM]

Indeed, it was a mild swipe at how a profession that was, until recently a reviled and in many cases outlawed profession has now suddenly become "respectable" in the transition to "security consultancies" (although one could say that the actions of some of these companies was anything but respectable)

 

[Kristovich]

Sure!

Many thanks!

Mercenaries, or private security companies?

Could be private security companies, on a very large scale! :lol:

 

[Hiromoon]

Dont worry guys, I'll treat the card template like I did the Civilian one. I know it's the UN, but what better way to portray generic non-combatant figures?

 

[Kristovich]

Dont worry guys, I'll treat the card template like I did the Civilian one. I know it's the UN, but what better way to portray generic non-combatant figures?

A huge sign saying; "NON-COMBAT!"? :lol:

 

[Hiromoon]

 

[mutantpoo]

What about a card for the USMC M-32 6 shot grenade launcher. :?:

 

[BuShips]

Hmm, not bad Hiromoon. Your "chess" analogy made me think of how sometimes "some" sides (maybe not MEA, but Fedayeen?) might try to use NCs for "human shields" and thus the idea just hit me that maybe the "PAWN" symbol might be more appropriate? :lol:

 

[Larac]

Hmm, not bad Hiromoon. Your "chess" analogy made me think of how sometimes "some" sides (maybe not MEA, but Fedayeen?) might try to use NCs for "human shields" and thus the idea just hit me that maybe the "PAWN" symbol might be more appropriate? :lol:

I can see a rule where some MEA forces are hidden, Until tey attack or a fig gets in X range, to show hiding in with the civves.

But to really work, we need lots of cheap civs.

Anyone know a source?

Lee

 

[Hiromoon]

Hmm, not bad Hiromoon. Your "chess" analogy made me think of how sometimes "some" sides (maybe not MEA, but Fedayeen?) might try to use NCs for "human shields" and thus the idea just hit me that maybe the "PAWN" symbol might be more appropriate? :lol:

Actually the Chess analogy comes from an actual company based out of England. It's now defunct, so I figure it's up for grabs.

 

[BuShips]

Hmm, not bad Hiromoon. Your "chess" analogy made me think of how sometimes "some" sides (maybe not MEA, but Fedayeen?) might try to use NCs for "human shields" and thus the idea just hit me that maybe the "PAWN" symbol might be more appropriate? :lol:

Actually the Chess analogy comes from an actual company based out of England. It's now defunct, so I figure it's up for grabs.

I'm still saying that the graphic needs to be a pawn though, just because it makes so much sense to me. Is it a big deal? Nah. :wink:

 

[Hiromoon]

Heh..... Nah.

 

[Kristovich]

If the card with the chess piece is for the mercs, I like it!

Many thanks Hiro!

 

[Hiromoon]

It is! and now for zombies!

 

[Kristovich]

Three words Hiro; "You Are Awsome!"

That's all I can say, you rock!

 

[Hiromoon]

Tell me, Kristovich, have the Swedes joined the EU yet?