Have Rules, No Stats...

You're correct.

Also, I just checked the card again....it's 80pts. You have to fiddle with the dynamic zoom though
 
nezeray said:
I think Hiro meant that he checked the playtest stats.. :)

Actually, I got that. I am just wondering if things changed since the playtest stats were released.

As for him yelling at you, eons ago before SST had it's general release, I had a PDF of the rulebook and was told by Alex that it was alright to make comments based on the info that I had. I just tried to keep things specific enough to answer questions, but vague enough that I didn't give too much away. To me, that is the key in this kind of situation. Whet their appetite with some information, but still leave them wanting more, ya know?
 
Yeah...well, let me get this PLA card worked out then. What do you guys think? The USMC card looks pretty good, huh?
 
I found some supposedly chinese camo for the background, got a lovely water mark on it, then stuck a PLA Airforce identifcation mark in the corner similar to the USMC card...
 
PLAInfantrySquadFinal.jpg
 
Looks great again, Hiro.

Oh, and last night, right before I fell asleep, I realized that 80 points makes total sense. I was thinking the USMC unit had three fireteams, not two. :? See what happens when you have no sleep and try to figure things from blurry pictures? Oi! :lol:
 
"best protected tanks in ever designed." I see the EF is letting education standards slacken to increase their military might.
 
something I just noticed - the GPMG and chaingun both say they may be fired in a shoot action with another weapon - does that mean that you can only fire two weapons from the tank or all three in one shoot action?
 
Back
Top