Tom Kalbfus said:
What would happen if someone like Jimmy Carter became Emperor and he decided to greatly increase the money supply of Imperial credits in order to fight poverty?
Npbody is sayig that fiat money is impervious to bad management. It's advantage is that it can be managed and is a viable foundation for an economic system. Gold isn't, as has been demonstrated many times throughout history. It involves very high transaction costs, has always been substituted by credit instruments anyway, and offers no actual counterveiling real benefits, even is there was actualy enough of it, which there isn't.
To you as an individual with your single human scale need for cash and credit, it might seem to work out ok. The problem is it just isn't scaleable to advanced economies distributed over massive space, involving billions of accounts and thousands of trillions of transactions. Wheelbarrows aren't going to cut it. Even paper and coin money is getting too expensive to manage to be worthwhile compared to electronic payments, which reduce transaction costs and make goods and services cheaper.
I mean how would you buy goods from Amazon in a gold economy, mail them a bar of gold and they'd send your goods by return post? How much is that going to increase the cost of the transaction, with Amazon having to manage warehouses full of gold on top of their goods?
Simon Hibbs