l33tpenguin
Mongoose
Assembling first. You can see some of them if you go to the gallary thread and look at my post. No paint yet, just assembled. I might rip the less spinnable ones apart and re do them, though
l33tpenguin said:
David said:The piece that transsects the ship always looked goofy to me. I cut them off when I built the "el grande" version of the model and used the ships for my Raider fleet.
l33tpenguin said:David said:The piece that transsects the ship always looked goofy to me. I cut them off when I built the "el grande" version of the model and used the ships for my Raider fleet.
I assume, from a design standpoint, that the fat side is the bridge, for some reason Earth ships like having distinguishable bridge or observation sections, which are wonderfully good targets. If that is so, the stick out the other side is most likely a counter balance. It would make sense, because if the ships center of gravity was off, it would make maneuvering awkward.
David said:l33tpenguin said:David said:The piece that transsects the ship always looked goofy to me. I cut them off when I built the "el grande" version of the model and used the ships for my Raider fleet.
I assume, from a design standpoint, that the fat side is the bridge, for some reason Earth ships like having distinguishable bridge or observation sections, which are wonderfully good targets. If that is so, the stick out the other side is most likely a counter balance. It would make sense, because if the ships center of gravity was off, it would make maneuvering awkward.
It ruins the sense of symmetry. It is, unlovely.
l33tpenguin said:David said:l33tpenguin said:I assume, from a design standpoint, that the fat side is the bridge, for some reason Earth ships like having distinguishable bridge or observation sections, which are wonderfully good targets. If that is so, the stick out the other side is most likely a counter balance. It would make sense, because if the ships center of gravity was off, it would make maneuvering awkward.
It ruins the sense of symmetry. It is, unlovely.
That almost sounds like you are quoting a vorlon.
David said:l33tpenguin said:David said:It ruins the sense of symmetry. It is, unlovely.
That almost sounds like you are quoting a vorlon.
Perhaps it came from the Vorlon inside of me? ;>
Beauty is a three edged gem....
l33tpenguin said:David said:l33tpenguin said:That almost sounds like you are quoting a vorlon.
Perhaps it came from the Vorlon inside of me? ;>
Beauty is a three edged gem....
How about 'The perfectly cut gem has no edges'
l33tpenguin said:If you look beyond the stars your eyes will see only darkness