Agile Reflexes spell mechanics

[PhilHibbs]

I'm not happy with the mechanics for Agile Reflexes, CoG p126. It grants +1 SR per 10% Grimoire, and also 1 additional CA Per 6 points of Magnitude added. I think this is the only sorcery spell that gains a beneficial effect from Magnitude and I'm not convinced that the rules need to be bent in this way, I'd rather it were per 6 full points of SR.

 

[taxboy]

I'm not happy with the mechanics for Agile Reflexes, CoG p126. It grants +1 SR per 10% Grimoire, and also 1 additional CA Per 6 points of Magnitude added. I think this is the only sorcery spell that gains a beneficial effect from Magnitude and I'm not convinced that the rules need to be bent in this way, I'd rather it were per 6 full points of SR.

sooo, house rule it....

 

[PhilHibbs]

sooo, house rule it....

Well, yes, of course, but that doesn't mean it isn't worth pointing out and discussing.

 

[taxboy]

sooo, house rule it....

Well, yes, of course, but that doesn't mean it isn't worth pointing out and discussing.

[tongue in cheek], what you think these forums are designed for open discussion and players thoughts? They are ONLY for adoring comments for the company and its talented writers...[/tongue in cheek]

 

[Dan True]

sooo, house rule it....

Well, yes, of course, but that doesn't mean it isn't worth pointing out and discussing.

[tongue in cheek], what you think these forums are designed for open discussion and players thoughts? They are ONLY for adoring comments for the company and its talented writers...[/tongue in cheek]

What? So he can't point out a rule that seems off to him?

- Dan

 

[taxboy]

Well, yes, of course, but that doesn't mean it isn't worth pointing out and discussing.

[tongue in cheek], what you think these forums are designed for open discussion and players thoughts? They are ONLY for adoring comments for the company and its talented writers...[/tongue in cheek]

What? So he can't point out a rule that seems off to him?

- Dan

No that is not what I am saying, but I think Phil simply missed off a section of his post, which is, "you may disagree but I don't like it so I will house rule it..." or more explicitly outline I assume his implied question of "what do others think of my statement?"

.. else it is quite a closed statement as read..left me thinking , ok, so what next...

..not a denial of his ability to question rules or suggest substitutions..

so i guess i should have posted this paragraph first rather than my initial response post..my bad...