ACTA RIP....

Bubba Ho-Tep said:
DaBogmu said:
This really bums me out. I have not even had a chance to play a game yet. :(

You'll get to play plenty at Mavencon, there are 20 of us signed up, assuming that they don't all bail on us now.


Will still be at Mavencon, now more than ever it will be nice to meet others that play and still love the game.
 
I know, I almost never post anymore, I just lurk. I just wanted to offer one, admittedly unusual and radical, idea.

I understand that the license for ACTA is not transferable, but what if there is no transfer, yet you still have a suitable miniature production portfolio? I have a marginal suggestion, not one without substantial risk. However, it would assuredly solve the miniature production problems once and for all.

Before I go any further, I should state the following:
I hereby state that I have no foreknowledge of any such transaction as pending, and I have no standing with any such firm, nor have I any insider knowledge of the financial state of any such firm in the marketplace. Neither do I have standing with Mongoose Publishing, nor have I any insider knowledge of the financial state of Mongoose Publishing. This should not be the source for any speculation, nor the start of any rumor.

If I could come up with another disclaimer here, I would.

The avenue may exist that leverages the weakness of the Dollar and the relative strength of the Pound is something we Americans are pretty good at: Merger and Acquisition. Licensing is usually unaffected by such transactions, so that is unlikely to prove a problem. An unaffiliated firm, such as Iron Wind, may see the competitive advantage of a substantially reduced overhead cost by increasing the total production volume that would be generated in expanding its product line, as well as diversification into gaming markets outside of miniatures that the Mongoose portfolio provides. They are fully capable of both Resin and Metal work, so SST production processes should be unaffected. Further, the whole stands to gain by continuing two miniature lines that, in and of themselves, I would assume to be fairly profitable, if overhead costs from other tasks were mitigated. US production with the weak dollar may provide some shelter for operating costs, and Mongoose may get some incidental value, if they so see fit, by effectively speculating on the return to value of the Dollar. They combination may be able to command retailing space in a more cohesive manner than as separate entities.

Iron Wind is only one possibility. I only single them out as a previously-mentioned example of an independent firm. I would be surprised if there were not more options than this.

The point is that you might be be able to transfer the license, but you may be able to preserve it by integrating with another positive-revenue independent manufacturer to the betterment of the whole.

There are tons of assumptions to such things that involve the Financial Statements, existing liabilities, comparative worth of firms, cultural issues that arise from a business combinations, and fundamental operating procedures. The negotiations themselves could be trying to say the least. Depending on the scenario, it may involve work to organize issues that arise from international ownership or partnership arrangements. However, such a thing would provide for the continuance of a revenue stream that otherwise would lie fallow, and that just makes zero business sense --- assuming, of course, that ACTA and SST could make money if the overhead issue stated in the Planet Mongoose posting is accurate, and a complete description of the issue at hand (there's no other issue out there). If this is not true, and ACTA is projected to be a losing venture at this time, no effort to consider such a combination is necessary.

I know this sort of a suggestion is fairly presumptuous, but I wanted to at least mention the concept as a possible solution. It is entirely probable that you have already considered such an option.
 
After reading through the 24 pages of this post, I went from "utterly pissed" too.. well, something a little calmer. I haven´t been around in this forum for quite a while, and right now I wish I would have stayed away. Still, some random thoughts about it all:

To quote the blog: " We'll continue to support it in S&P, sure, but if there is sufficient demand, we will continue with book releases as well"

IF there is sufficient demand... sounds a little like what happened to Mighty Armies, line discontinued, some S&P support, but ultimately sold off to another manufacturer. Sure, ACTA is on a whole different level than MA, but then that game at least still has miniatures... no outsourcing because of the strict license agreement. Didn´t WB make AOG destroy their leftover stock when the licence ran out? I guess that goes to show how serious they are about the whole thing...

I agree with the "no new shiny, no new players" comments made above. The game will not be played forever, and it won´t experience any noticable growth on counters alone. In our gaming group we have maybe 90% of all available fleets in a rather playable size, all owned by hardcore fans of the series, so the game will be continued for a while here, and maybe dusted off every once in a while in the coming years.

But the B5 franchise itself isn´t getting any younger, so getting new players into the game was getting more and more difficult with potential players not having seen the series, and now there won´t be any more eye-candy to get them interested in the first place. That´s dissapointing, to say the least.

I was planing to add the full ACTA range to my little online shop as soon as the promised solutions to the distributing were felt - not quite the solution I was hoping for, I might add.

I think what annoys me the most is the fact that there was what looked like a promising future for the game - yearly supplements, rapid-prototyped miniatures; there was talk about coming TLT ships. Now, these things won´t come. Sure, I suppose supplements will come out every once in a while, as long as the sales pay off for the working hours put into the books (with the internal printing facility, MGP can luckily adjust their production values to the demand pretty easily, I guess).

But there has also been talk about a new counter set for a long, long time, and that also never showed up. As others have mentioned before, such a set is not only absolutely vital to the survival of the game, but also has to be of superior quality when compared to the last counters to be interesting.

Getting B5 miniatures through my distributor has always been very difficult, and the casting quality just wasn´t what it was supposed to be - so I´m thinking that maybe B5 realy HAS had it´s run, that maybe it is time for it to make room for something new, while it leads a background life on the tables of the true fans of the game, supported by the odd supplement.

Still, I hate seeing my favourite game going down the drain. Really, of all the games I knew, ACTA was among the few which I thought had really found their niche and could hold out against GW and the current problems on the miniatures games market. Guess I was wrong after all...

So, what´s next? A new game based on the rules set? Maybe a cooperation with GZG, a joined Call to Arms/Full Thrust game? MGP publishing the rules, GZG taking care of the miniatures? No, GZG wouldn´t be able to keep up with the demand. It´s all well selling the odd FT fleet to some random customer around the world, but ACTA really has built up a massive, if slightly scattered, fanbase.

So maybe that´s part of the problem? Maybe CTA has just outgrown itself, has become to heavy to bear by MGP alone? Or to put it less poetic: It would have become too expensive too replace the crappy moulds and reorganize the distribution channels to make CTA miniatures available on the required scale and in the desired quality.

After all I´ve read, MGP has put a lot of money into their miniatures games and lost big time; all the preparations for new miniatures and games, the whole prepaint thing including the prototypes for BFE and the planned SST Evo, sure didn´t come for free.

So, why is it that, even knowing all these things, I still feel pretty disapointed?

So, now there are a couple of ships and fighters which cannot be represented on the tabletop because they have neither miniature nor counter. And some of those which actually have miniatures don´t make it to the distributors (including my Rivas). That sucks.

Funny, just last week I talked my local gaming club into doing a big ACTA game again, after not having been able to get the players together for quite a while. It will be Centauri and Crusade era EA attacking a station protected by Narn and Brakiri, with each player bringing along 8 War level points worth of ships. The Station will be represented by the massive old, original BSG Basestar model (guess it will be a Vree station after all), and we players are really looking forward to this game.

Still, I can´t tell how much enthusiasm will be left to ever repeat something like this, or to ever play an ACTA campaign (so cool rules, so little time).




Well, I warned you it would be pretty random thoughts! :roll:
 
wkehrman said:
The big question, of course, is how does this whole situation convince me to give Mongoose any more money? I'm not talking about giving them any more B5:ACTA money, I'm talking about giving them any more MONEY AT ALL!

I must say I kind of agree. While I plan on finishing the fleets I have, after that I cannot say I will purchase another Mongoose product. I had thought about SST a while back, but I'm glad I didn't simply because as you say it is now dead. I don't see anyone playing it anymore and I seriously doubt I will in the future except as a one-off. Now while I plan to keep playing with the stuff I have, eventually I know B5:ACTA will probably die off as well. As you say, it seems par for the course at the moment and I am reluctant to trust Mongoose to provide any different support for whatever their next product may be.

Poi (and others) is right, the old blood will keep playing, but without new blood, the game is history.

When I pick up a game I like to think I will be able to play it and find opponents for it when I go somewhere. Without new blood, the latter cannot happen. It took me some time before I decided to get into B5:ACTA because I really didn't need another miniatures game. But it looked fun and I like the storyline so I said a couple months ago why not and purchased the beginnings of a fleet. Had I known in less than 2 months the game would be going away I would have chosen to stay away. As you say, it seems like we were lied to. If the profitability of the line was diminishing, I know it had to be obvious a long time ago. This cannot be something that just came up all of a sudden. While I understand Mongoose had no choice, I don't like being misled and that's really what this feels like.

Anyway, JMO. I do still like the game at least...

Cheers, Gary
 
I have to apologize to everyone. This is all my fault. :oops: I just discovered MGP by searchig for WWII naval games (VaS came up) and as I was looking into the entire website/forum, I thought maybe that I would consider SST and ACTA also. I play several Games Workshop games and I am constantly looking for something other than GW. I consistently prove my bad luck and here is another fine example. I finally find some good competition for GW and a company I would rather give my money to and bam - see ya.

So this all boils down to my bad luck. Sorry everyone. :oops:
 
silashand said:
If the profitability of the line was diminishing, I know it had to be obvious a long time ago. This cannot be something that just came up all of a sudden. While I understand Mongoose had no choice, I don't like being misled and that's really what this feels like.

That's not necessarily true. Whilst we'll probably never know the commercial realities behind this decision, all sorts of things can happen in business extremely quickly and the quicker you adapt to a new business model, the better.

Someone else has already posted a thread from a different forum related to the cost of metal - for all we know, this and the weak dollar may have forced Mongooses model supplier to up their prices dramatically, and these costs are perhaps only now being fed through to Mongoose and would've made the retail price economically unviable for both Mongoose and the consumer.

There are countless other reasons which could suddenly force such a decision which may not have been anticipated even 30 days ago - such is the nature of the commercial world!

Regards,

Dave
 
So, is the painting guide still going to be produced?
I was going to sell my Flames of War Army to by more ACTA but now maybe Ill sell my ACTA to buy more FOW:(
 
.I for one will still be supporting ACTA. Supplements and campaign packs are a good idea.

ACTA is the 2nd figure game I have gotten into (Battletech first). Ask any of Gregs Crew (trade marked) on how in a short 6 months I have gotten into the game.

I cannot see any of us abandoning a good game. ACTA is a good game and mini production being halted will not detract from that. I can see either next year mini production will re start maybe in resin instead of metal.

So all those who are crying "ACTA is dead" it is not. We will stay playing a game we love. I hope Mongoose still make it a regular event the campaign weekend :D
 
Da Boss said:
she even poped up in 24 :)
Yeah, when I saw her I hadn't seen B5 for ages. I knew I recognized her but just couldn't place it. Then suddenly... "OMG SHE'S A TEEP!!! LOOK OUT JACK!"
 
I think most mean that ACTA is dead as a mainstream game, and the `actively supporting` players will be relegated back to some back corner in the local clubhouse for the perhaps once or twice game a year. I`m not meaning this as `right now`, but what will be perhaps starting a year down the road.

You know the types, the ones the rest of a club regards as a curiosity in their middle, been there a lot (the B5W / FA era when the net wasn`t widespread etc). With acta now, you had an easily available range, nice support etc and just give peeps the dvd sets and of they went, going for a few years of gaming.

Sad part is, past friday our game group of acta players was actually the largest one present at the clubhouse playing that evening, even `stealing` people away from the WFB / 40k games (we have 150 members) to our cosy, not so little anymore, corner, but I can say for sure (yes, we discussed this already) that many of them will be lost again.

Yeah well, it has been a nice few years, but now ACTA is like Star Trek: it ain`t dead, it went asleep (to quote a rather popular sentence of late)
 
well some of the above solutions do seem to be good. I would suggest moving out of puter minis and going into multipart resign or plastic kits. Part of the problem with those models is that the pieces are too large and to hard to shape, especially the Posiedon!

Smaller peices, more Quality to the model.

While the mini's line may be down for now, this could be viewed as an oportunity instead of a set back. One can track how fast the remaining models get bought up and then begin anew if it appears there is sufficient interest.

Switching to resin models is perfectly acceptable for many players.

1 - they have a lower melting point then metal so it will be less strain on the molds.

2 - They can be produced for far cheaper then metal models. Panzerchiff is a good example.

3 - Since scale is nothing more then Athstetic, don't produce models that are so large. They should be no bigger then the current Omega's. and they can stand to lose a few pounds.

Start from scratch, release smaller ships that are easy to produce (like the patrol level ships) and then move up as sales dictate.

The biggest hurdel is that old players only need new ships... so maybe instead of building a stock, keep it small and only cast models to fill orders. Make sure people are aware of the extra time and most people will be patient. A good example is one guy who recently recieved his mothership of late. :)
 
The miniatures will be back. 25 pages of posts in 24 hours suggests there's too much of a market to remain untapped for very long.
 
it's 25 pages of posts from probably less than 50 people though. 50 customers does not makea solid case for manufacturing!
 
And even those 50 people, don't necessarily buy many minis. I pretty much already have as many as I'll ever be getting, maybe the odd one or two here and there but not a lot.
 
Burger said:
And even those 50 people, don't necessarily buy many minis. I pretty much already have as many as I'll ever be getting, maybe the odd one or two here and there but not a lot.

Yup. Old players aren't best target for model purchaces. It's the new blood that brings biggest revenue likely(let's see. I have big ISA, EA, centauri and vorlon fleets. Haven't even painted them yet! Didn't expect to buy more ships for quite a while anyway...Though Narns and shadows were plans for the future but that would have been late 2008-2009 type of project).

Mongoose has lot better view on the real numbers on sales and seems they are not positive :(
 
Back
Top