A
Anonymous
Guest
I wouldn't say that many early illustrators didn't take RPG art seriously. I believe it's more a case that the style of art was new, and the artists had to develop it.
It might have crossed over into printing technology.
Have a look at old sci-fi/fantasy book covers (original editions) and magazines like Weird Tales or Amazing Stories. The style was very different and color quality was poor, and artists would not have had the art and movies of today to take inspiration from - in those days you could write about "indescribable horrors" and get away with it, like every Lovecraft book. That wouldn't work today. The things we would recognise as "fantasy art" start around the 70s with artists like Vallejo and evolved in parallel with D&D.
edit: My artist friend tells me there was a Frazetta book from the late 60s that started off the whole fantasy art genre in the 70s.
It might have crossed over into printing technology.
Have a look at old sci-fi/fantasy book covers (original editions) and magazines like Weird Tales or Amazing Stories. The style was very different and color quality was poor, and artists would not have had the art and movies of today to take inspiration from - in those days you could write about "indescribable horrors" and get away with it, like every Lovecraft book. That wouldn't work today. The things we would recognise as "fantasy art" start around the 70s with artists like Vallejo and evolved in parallel with D&D.
edit: My artist friend tells me there was a Frazetta book from the late 60s that started off the whole fantasy art genre in the 70s.