Wayfarer Logo

[Malakor]

So, Mr. Sprange,

By any chance do you have a logo to show us as a teaser??

 

[Dan True]

*please let it be a halfling on a stick, please let it be a halfling on a stick, please let it be a halfling on a stick, please let it be a halfling on a stick...*

 

[alex_greene]

It'll probably look something like the word "WAYFARER" picked out in a pseudo-runic script against a wood grain background, perhaps with a sword running lengthwise behind the title.

 

[PhilHibbs]

Here's the cover:

:wink:

 

[danskmacabre]

lol

 

[Malakor]

It'll probably look something like the word "WAYFARER" picked out in a pseudo-runic script against a wood grain background, perhaps with a sword running lengthwise behind the title.

About what I figured, I'm just nuts about seeing logos.

Ok, I'm just Nuts. :lol:

Just for giggles, I did this a few nights ago. Used some of the silhouettes from Telecanter's http://recedingrules.blogspot.com/ Blog

http://www.box.net/shared/7cufhjsuar

(couldn't remember how to actually attach the image so it would show)

 

[Valarian]

Reminds me of an old post on another forum. Discussions about a Fantasy version of Traveller. Somebody did a mock-up of the box set, based on the Classic Traveller design.

 

[Exubae]

Good Point Phil:
I wonder if YOGC will complain about Mongoose using the name Wayfarer or is different enough from wayfarers to avoid legality.

http://yeoldegamingcompanye.com/products.htm

 

[RosenMcStern]

YOGC stated publicly that they had contacted Mongoose, and they were ok with the results of said contact (actually, more than ok, they said).

 

[alex_greene]

So Wayfarer is a go.

Or should that be "depart?"

 

[zomben]

Guys, the incompetents at Mongoose still haven't updated their home page with the RQII logo. You -really- think they'll get their shit together to show off their (inevitably crap) Wayfarer one?

 

[taxboy]

Guys, the incompetents at Mongoose still haven't updated their home page with the RQII logo. You -really- think they'll get their **** together to show off their (inevitably crap) Wayfarer one?

Whoa,,,take some anti-Troll pills mate.....

 

[lastbesthope]

Guys, the incompetents at Mongoose still haven't updated their home page with the RQII logo. You -really- think they'll get their **** together to show off their (inevitably crap) Wayfarer one?

Presumably since they are still selling RuneQuest books, they still have the RuneQuest licence, until it expires why wouldn't they keep the runeQuest logo on their website???

LBH

 

[broken serenity]

I imagine the logo wil be revealed at gencon since thats the most logical place to do such things(also they still have to launch the new site which is abit overdue atm considering they said end of the month last month lol).

 

[Robin]

Reminds me of an old post on another forum. Discussions about a Fantasy version of Traveller. Somebody did a mock-up of the box set, based on the Classic Traveller design.

For 15 quid I'd snap that up without even thinking about it. 20 quid and I'd think about it for a little while.

For me, this sort of format, boxed or not, is the way to go with RPGs. Keep them cheap and put them on the shelf with the novels that inspire them. Just need to get the content right...

Regards

Robin

 

[lastbesthope]

I imagine the logo wil be revealed at gencon since thats the most logical place to do such things(also they still have to launch the new site which is abit overdue atm considering they said end of the month last month lol).

Oh they;ve been saying we'll see the new website for a lot longer than that....

LBH

 

[HalfOrc HalfBiscuit]

Reminds me of an old post on another forum. Discussions about a Fantasy version of Traveller. Somebody did a mock-up of the box set, based on the Classic Traveller design.

For 15 quid I'd snap that up without even thinking about it. 20 quid and I'd think about it for a little while.

For me, this sort of format, boxed or not, is the way to go with RPGs. Keep them cheap and put them on the shelf with the novels that inspire them. Just need to get the content right...

Regards

Robin

I'd agree with that. I also think "Wanderer" is actually a better name than "Wayfarer".

 

[MongooseMatt]

(also they still have to launch the new site which is abit overdue atm considering they said end of the month last month lol).

Actually, it is pretty much done - we are just doing some testing/adding new features right now.

It actually exists, I tell you!

 

[Malakor]

...I'd agree with that. I also think "Wanderer" is actually a better name than "Wayfarer".

They could always call it the "Vicious Vagabonds of Valarus" ? Theres a name that invokes visions of fighting and looting :LOL

 

[duncan_disorderly]

Guys, the incompetents at Mongoose still haven't updated their home page with the RQII logo. You -really- think they'll get their **** together to show off their (inevitably crap) Wayfarer one?

Presumably since they are still selling RuneQuest books, they still have the RuneQuest licence, until it expires why wouldn't they keep the runeQuest logo on their website???

LBH

Given their history of updating and correcting things, why would we expect them to remove it when the licence runs out? (The pre-production shot of the Core rulebook has the wrong rune on it. You would have thought it would have been corrected when the rune was changed, or if not them once the book was shipping...)

But you missed Zomben's point. They changed the logo when they launched RQ2 (or added a new logo). Not that you'd notice from the website