aethelwulf22
Mongoose
I'm sure this has brought up already but just in case it hasn't...on p.34 the heading Adventureres should be Adventurers and the same on the contents page.
I am rather irritated myself, since it wasn't my spelling mistake... But as I have learned these things do happen, no matter how much you strive for perfection.aethelwulf22 said:I was so excited about Vikings that I was going to make an exception...but the rather obvious typo and the lack of response as to whether it has been fixed doesn't bode well and I think I'll just hold off.
Well, frustratingly I still don't have my copy of the book, but Loz has received his. Unfortunately it appears the spelling mistake is still in there. My apologies on behalf of the company that it wasn't fixed in time.aethelwulf22 said:Any news on whether the typo has been fixed as it's due out next week?
This second quote refers to the printed book itself, dated today.Now had chance to look through Vikings and just want to say... Bloody marvellous.
It excels the old Glorantha set because it truly evokes the culture, history and mythology which, good as the RQ3 effort was, left a lot to assumption. I love this book. Really love it.
Now, I'm always a bit dubious when someone comes out of the blue with gushing compliments like these... I immediately wonder what they're after! But I have a lot of faith in Loz because he's always the first to give me a hard critique if he thinks I deserve it.I got 'Vikings' the other day and it looks fabulous; really great. Superb job. I think its the most handsome book we've done.
Jujitsudave said:Any word if there will be an Ancient Rome book (maybe an MRQ specific conversion the Alepthar one)?