Dag'Nabbit
Mongoose
Man, the CIA has had people on Proxima for about a decade now. I thought everyone knew that.
CARTMAG said:I see dead people.......
quote]
I dunno about that, but I do often hear "stupid people".... boomboo :lol: m
I See Dead People
How did you know
they were in the morgue freezer..
wa-wa-wa-waaaaaaaaa
ThatOneGuy said:Neo, I can not idly stand by and allow the proud culture heritage of the Proximan people to be denied. Are you truly so ignorant that you have lost sight of the pain we, the people of Earth have put them through? God, when will we learn…
ThatOneGuy said:Neo, I can not idly stand by and allow the proud culture heritage of the Proximan people to be denied. Are you truly so ignorant that you have lost sight of the pain we, the people of Earth have put them through? God, when will we learn…
Dr Goth said:Proximans aside the book's not very good.
I'm sorry to drag this up again but as I recently discovered this forum (about 10 minutes ago) I missed the whole discussion.
I don't feel that the book is rasist. Prejudiced yes, but I wouldn't say rasist. What disappoints me is that I find it badly researched. That has nothing to do with future plausability. The stuff written on more timeless or present topics is not very correct either.
What I meant was that the bad research cannot be explained away with the fact that it is science fiction (plausible or not) or just a vision of the future. I don't need plausibility but I do want descriptions of contemporary Earth to be correct. Sorry for that. As English isn't my first language I sometimes do not express myself correctly.Neo said:Dr Goth said:Proximans aside the book's not very good.
I'm sorry to drag this up again but as I recently discovered this forum (about 10 minutes ago) I missed the whole discussion.
I don't feel that the book is rasist. Prejudiced yes, but I wouldn't say rasist. What disappoints me is that I find it badly researched. That has nothing to do with future plausability. The stuff written on more timeless or present topics is not very correct either.
It isn't based on plausibility because it isn't based on a plausible universe... it is science fiction !!! Whether or not the cultures turned out as you imagine the actual ones might in say a 100 years is totally moot... as the ones portrayed in the Bab 5 universe were not based that way either. What they were based on was existing canon and fictional material provided and then expanded upon to fill it out.. and with Warner Brothers approval I might add! Hence how can it be badly researched...
I don't need plausibility but I do want descriptions of contemporary Earth to be correct.
I beg to differ but I should point out that with contemporary I really mean time less descriptions.Traveller-61 said:The EF book does not contain descriptions of contemporary Earth,
He did? As I said I've missed these forums so far and therefore any discussions prior to this. If he did, kudos to him. I'll notch him up a bit again...Traveller-61 said:The author did apolgise on these boards for any offence he might have unwittingly caused and after all: you are running your own version of the B5 universe so you can always alter whatever you want.
Thank you, I'll have that in mind. It's not that expensive so it might just be worth buying after all (and I won't have to write a whole story arch myself 8)).Traveller-61 said:I would recommend the Fiery Trial - there is a some military type action but a lot more is good old fashioned role playing where starting a firefight will not only get characters hurt, it could just end the campaign there and then.
Apologies, I misinterpreted your statement.Traveller-61 wrote:
The EF book does not contain descriptions of contemporary Earth,
I beg to differ but I should point out that with contemporary I really mean time less descriptions.