AndrewW said:
aspqrz said:
There are lots better books out there. And Trilogies that are actually consisting of three books, too :shock:
Whoever said it was a trilogy?
The author?
The publisher?
Both?
I thought I hinted strongly enough to indicate that I read them as *first printing* and *first release* (allowing a week or so for them to wend their way from the US).
They were touted by Author and Publisher as a *trilogy* when the first came out and, possibly, when the second came out as well.
The third was, IIRC (its over 20 years ago now, and I'm practically an OAP :wink: ), the first inkling that all was not completely well in trilogy land.
I read four and five merely because I'd sunk a lot of time already.
When rumours of #6 came out, I threw up my hands in disgust and vowed never to read another of his books ... and I haven't.
They were, IIRC, moderately entertaining, but certainly not unusually so, and reasonably obscure, even tho they have been reprinted, so I can't see that they'd be a good commercial choice. It'd be cheaper for Mongoose to make up their own background from whole cloth, and, given the quality of their writers, I'd say the difference in sales, if any, would be minimal.
YMMV.
Never argue with a *fan* :wink:
Phil