In 1e, if someone was seriously wounded they were not allowed to carry out a minor action (i.e., only one significant action allowed but that was still convertible into two minor actions). This seemed to make sense as you would be "spending time" saying "ouch!"
This rule seems to have been dropped. In fact the terminology "seriously wounded/injured" is no longer defined although the wording appears in numerous places in the draft. I understand that the damage system has changed with all damage coming off firstly from END so you can't get the situation where you have at least one point off of END, STR and DEX. Is END reduced to 0 the new seriously wounded/injured? Or have you completely dispensed with the distinction between just wounded and seriously wounded?
I'm just wondering if that is a design choice or was forgotten from the draft?
If formally dropped from the rules, I think I'd house rule it back in making END = 0 a serious wound and then docking one minor action. Surely there should be some sort of penalty for being seriously wounded/injured.
This rule seems to have been dropped. In fact the terminology "seriously wounded/injured" is no longer defined although the wording appears in numerous places in the draft. I understand that the damage system has changed with all damage coming off firstly from END so you can't get the situation where you have at least one point off of END, STR and DEX. Is END reduced to 0 the new seriously wounded/injured? Or have you completely dispensed with the distinction between just wounded and seriously wounded?
I'm just wondering if that is a design choice or was forgotten from the draft?
If formally dropped from the rules, I think I'd house rule it back in making END = 0 a serious wound and then docking one minor action. Surely there should be some sort of penalty for being seriously wounded/injured.